Jump to content
British Speedway Forum
racers and royals

Warsaw GP Saturday May 13th 2023

Recommended Posts

Unfortunate for Holder, never ideal to award a final but in cases like this it would be the right thing to do. No consolation for him now but I'm sure he'll win a GP soon enough. Thought Doyle was unlucky, can kind of see that the referee might have thought he made the most of it but there's no doubt if it had been the other way around then that would have been seen as enough contact to exclude. 

Hopefully Lindgren can continue his form and make the title race interesting. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Leicester Lion said:

I presume when you say passed you mean past. But that wasn't the case. The gap was there but Zmarzlik didn't complete the pass. They were side by side. Normally I'd say the rider who doesn't complete the pass is to blame if he brings the opponent down. But in this instance Doyle was culpable to some degree. Not an easy call and that's why we have referees to make those judgements.

Please accept my sincere apologies for my grammatical error and any offence it caused you.

In hindsight, I can see that this hideous faux Pas completely invalidates the point I was making and would have made it very difficult to understand. 

Thanks for pointing it out :D:t:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, The Cheese said:

Unfortunate for Holder, never ideal to award a final but in cases like this it would be the right thing to do. No consolation for him now but I'm sure he'll win a GP soon enough. Thought Doyle was unlucky, can kind of see that the referee might have thought he made the most of it but there's no doubt if it had been the other way around then that would have been seen as enough contact to exclude. 

Hopefully Lindgren can continue his form and make the title race interesting. 

I think it was a 50 -50 call..the main point that you quite rightly point out is how unlucky Holder is.. Common sense tells us that the rule should be that the race should have been awarded in this case.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, screm said:

Maybe we need VAR in speedway.

We have ..a ref can watch video evidence. The trouble with any form of Var it call still come down to one person's opinion .

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me why this race was not awarded to Jack Holder? In GB racing it would have been. Why do the other two riders get another bite of the cherry? Clearly going into the last lap Holder had won the race.  Is it different in grand Prix. To me it lacks common sense.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, AFCB Wildcat said:

Please accept my sincere apologies for my grammatical error and any offence it caused you.

In hindsight, I can see that this hideous faux Pas completely invalidates the point I was making and would have made it very difficult to understand. 

Thanks for pointing it out :D:t:

Either way you were saying Zmarzlik had passed (or got past) Doyle, which wasn't the case as they were side by side. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I think Zmarzlik was at fault 

However it’s funny reading old man Middlo who believes the referee cost Jack Holder??

Obviously the Poole boss doesn’t know the rules that no race can be awarded at GP level….. o don’t agree with the rule but surely Muddlo should know it 

Unfortunate for Holder ….. but someone had to be excluded so to see Muddlo get his knickers in a twist over the decision costing Holder is hilarious 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Gavan said:

Personally I think Zmarzlik was at fault 

However it’s funny reading old man Middlo who believes the referee cost Jack Holder??

Obviously the Poole boss doesn’t know the rules that no race can be awarded at GP level….. o don’t agree with the rule but surely Muddlo should know it 

Unfortunate for Holder ….. but someone had to be excluded so to see Muddlo get his knickers in a twist over the decision costing Holder is hilarious 

FFS man (women)! You could have just left it at your first line - but no, your obsession with all things Poole is tedious. You just can’t help yourself. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Leicester Lion said:

Either way you were saying Zmarzlik had passed (or got past) Doyle, which wasn't the case as they were side by side. 

Okay, again, in the literal interpretation of  'past', he hadn't cleared Doyle completely but if it makes you happy, the leading edge of his machine was in front of Doyle's before the point of contact.

Doyle blocked the move up the inside on the preceding laps but left the door wide open on this occasion. What was Zmarzlik supposed to do? To say that he went for a gap that wasn't there (and I know you didn't say that) is nonsense, as it clearly was. 

From that point on Zmarzlik rode the only line he could and made no attempt to move Doyle out. Doyle had the option to change tack with his preferred line taken but chose not to hence the contact.

So apart from nitpicking the interpretation & spelling of 'past', what is your point? 

What did Zmarzlik do wrong? I'm quite prepared to hear someone with an alternative opinion to mine without trying to belittle them.

(Disclaimer. This post probably contains spelling or grammatical errors. Read at your own risk) 

Edited by AFCB Wildcat
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, HenryW said:

 

:unsure:

Funny that. I thought Klindt was right into all the conspiracy theories going round the last couple of years. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The incident between Smarzlik and Doyle reminded me of an almost identical coming together in last year's Premier League Final between Brady Kurtz and Tobiasz Musielak. Kurtz fell off on the outside but it was Musielak who was excluded.

I personally think Smarzlik should have gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, screm said:

Maybe we need VAR in speedway.

We have, it's called slow motion replays :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When the Referee turns up with two young children & has to walk around with an FIM coat on he is more concerned about keeping himself & his kids safe.

He made a decision based on fear. If this had happened outside of Poland then I believe the outcome would have been different

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, screm said:

Since when was Neymar in SGP.:blink:

You aren't intelligent enough to understand the mataphor...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy