lisa-colette 6,032 Posted September 6, 2023 2 minutes ago, Fromafar said: The only thing I can see wrong with statement is his own test was not taken at the same time. Yeah probably why they refused it and waiting for lab one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
szkocjasid 3,028 Posted September 6, 2023 20 minutes ago, Fromafar said: The only thing I can see wrong with statement is his own test was not taken at the same time. That was my thought too, if he gave a sample the next day, he's proved he was clean on Wednesday, but not Tuesday? Although his comments about them not allowing him to give a second sample must be his best argument, if they've not followed the correct testing protocol, how can they suspend him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fromafar 10,363 Posted September 6, 2023 Just now, szkocjasid said: That was my thought too, if he gave a sample the next day, he's proved he was clean on Wednesday, but not Tuesday? Although his comments about them not allowing him to give a second sample must be his best argument, if they've not followed the correct testing protocol, how can they suspend him? Is it not the case that they only take 1 sample and split it into 2 as the 2nd sample as the standard procedure.It is in a lot of other sports. 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
szkocjasid 3,028 Posted September 6, 2023 Just now, Fromafar said: Is it not the case that they only take 1 sample and split it into 2 as the 2nd sample as the standard procedure.It is in a lot of other sports. I had thought that, but reading what Worrall said made me think they can give 2 samples? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iainb 5,017 Posted September 6, 2023 3 minutes ago, szkocjasid said: Although his comments about them not allowing him to give a second sample must be his best argument, if they've not followed the correct testing protocol, how can they suspend him? I thought they only took one sample that they then split into two? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grand Central 2,654 Posted September 6, 2023 They don't take two samples. That is not procedure. They take one and split it into A and B. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iainb 5,017 Posted September 6, 2023 Just now, szkocjasid said: I had thought that, but reading what Worrall said made me think they can give 2 samples? He probably, naturally, wanted to give a second sample after the first one read positive, but that is not the procedure, presumably because any positive element may have been expelled from the body... looks like this one may go to court 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Teromaafan 586 Posted September 6, 2023 The SCB have now released a statement confirming that Worrall and Boxall were the ones tested and provided ' non negative ' results. This coincides with the riders names that did not compete in the Plymouth v Berwick match. Thanks for the SCB clearing up all the doubts by stating the bleeding obvious on this matter. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Monarchs2468 82 Posted September 6, 2023 44 minutes ago, iainb said: looks like this one may go to court Maybe have him up with Tai, Edinburgh Speedway and the many others you've pissed your pants about. Such a drama all the time with you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iainb 5,017 Posted September 6, 2023 11 minutes ago, Monarchs2468 said: Maybe have him up with Tai, Edinburgh Speedway and the many others you've pissed your pants about. Such a drama all the time with you. You're such a sociopathic pissflap, go play with your tiny prick and leave this one to the big boys Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iainb 5,017 Posted September 6, 2023 52 minutes ago, Teromaafan said: The SCB have now released a statement confirming that Worrall and Boxall were the ones tested and provided ' non negative ' results. This coincides with the riders names that did not compete in the Plymouth v Berwick match. Thanks for the SCB clearing up all the doubts by stating the bleeding obvious on this matter. At least Worrall has apologised to his clubs, if not the fans... which is more than Morris ever did Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Monarchs2468 82 Posted September 6, 2023 27 minutes ago, iainb said: You're such a sociopathic pissflap, go play with your tiny prick and leave this one to the big boys You've tried too hard there it doesn't make sense, but fair play for effort. Considering yourself a 'big boy' is quite incredible. You really are quite the show, as always. See you in court....no, wait Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Najjer 2,890 Posted September 7, 2023 13 hours ago, Wee Eck said: The number being 3? And only one has been proved so far. It’s not very many, is it? That’s 1 too many and 1 more than it should be for a ‘professional sport’ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wee Eck 703 Posted September 7, 2023 16 minutes ago, Najjer said: That’s 1 too many and 1 more than it should be for a ‘professional sport’ I don’t disagree but the problem seems to be recreational rather than performance enhancing drug use which seems endemic amongst those involved with extreme sports. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iainb 5,017 Posted September 7, 2023 7 hours ago, Monarchs2468 said: You've tried too hard there it doesn't make sense, but fair play for effort. Considering yourself a 'big boy' is quite incredible. You really are quite the show, as always. See you in court....no, wait pissflap Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
