Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/06/2026 in Posts

  1. oi, im always right, just things change ๐Ÿ˜‚
    6 points
  2. I don't like where I work, but I go there e everyday cos the money ๐Ÿ˜
    5 points
  3. That's a relief! At least Lions won't finish bottom ๐Ÿ˜
    4 points
  4. Think they'd be better off scrapping the word Development word in the title of the league or even going back to the old name of Conference League
    4 points
  5. At the end of the day we should all be grateful the fans have a speedway team to watch every other Thursday depending how the fixtures work out what with all the uncertainty over the last few months finding new owners, its gonna be a culture shock for sure not seeing Doyle and Emil round Foxhall every home match tho, we're certainly been blessed over the last 3 seasons watching them regularly, but times change as we all know and nothing lasts forever.
    3 points
  6. If it is Brennan at 1 and also a team with King as one the 3 heat leaders and your best reserve is Jenkins,, I think we can safely predict a last place finish. I've heard it said alot of times in the past,, any team is better than having no team, let's see how that statement stands up crowd level wise
    3 points
  7. Everyone complains about the lack of track time and opportunities available for prospective new riders to try speedway....... Fact Not many tracks offer opportunities, but different organisations offer these to facilitate new riders. They also give opportunities to facilitate rider improvement and enhancement. What actually happens is that their is no communication between each track when they offer these facilities and they conflict. Would it not be better that all tracks and training facilities communicate with each other so no conflict of same day activity conflict, meaning lack of numbers deem they cannot take place due to lack of number and all are cancelled due to lack of numbers?
    2 points
  8. More chance of Simon than Robert ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป
    2 points
  9. Not a bad looking side in the watered down league you would hope Lambert and Tungate could put a point on each the other bar King should maintain current averages, I suppose the other question is can Brennan kick onto the next level which will be a harder step to make.
    2 points
  10. It has been 1.5 in recent seasons
    2 points
  11. No he was woeful at Foxhall over the last 2 years with Oxford
    2 points
  12. Baldyman is right. Itโ€™ll no doubt be spun that itโ€™s been a winter of concern that the club might not even run, so be grateful you have some speedway to watch. People ainโ€™t daft though and that wonโ€™t wash. Yes we have one of the better attendances in the UK, but the Ipswich fans wonโ€™t turn out for any old dross. The season before we dropped to the Championship around 2010/11/12? We had a dreadful team and finished bottom. It was spot the supporter on the terraces so letโ€™s not kid ourselves that the crowd will turn out regardless. Anyway, we donโ€™t know the team yet so weโ€™re getting ahead of ourselves a tad. Letโ€™s give them a chance and see what they deliver.
    2 points
  13. Yeah trying to put together a competitive side including brennan, king & Jenkins with 18.95 for the other 3 and nobody higher than a 7.05 as brennan is at 1... tricky!
    2 points
  14. OK after going through the entire thing found this section much higher which does seem to clarify the 25% only applies once so that should settle that. Guess Jenkins will be a 4.50 after all! Why this is in a different section who knows...
    2 points
  15. Berwick could have easily fitted him in but stuck with Smith
    2 points
  16. brennan is your no1. so build your teams with that in mind
    2 points
  17. Now the Aces promotion machine can really kick into gear and go to town advertising the first Premiership match against... ??????????? Not sure why the four teams so far running haven't put out a fixture list . We know all meetings will be Mondays and Thursdays so just use the blank dates left to run the Ipswich and, maybe, Northampton meetings if they do exist.... Any Mondays and Thursdays blank can be just TBC until all sorted... At the least then fans can start to plan around some dates...
    2 points
  18. A team manager would want whoever is likely to score the most points and that isn't Max Perry, he improved his average by a little last season but you would not call him up and coming, if Workington were able to fit him in then Etherington would not have a team place, would Perry beat Etherington on a regular basis, not sure he would.
    2 points
  19. When I go to the Brentwood gig I will try and get a chat with him after about what he is doing for Speedway futures. He might have some dough in the Northampton project silent partner?
    2 points
  20. If the job of the NL is to bring on future Champ riders, then riders who can't get anywhere near Lambert won't cope in the Champ. These riders should be at the lower end of the NL, not an alternative option to the Lambert signing. If the NL was weakened further, it's be much harder for rider stepping up, how do you know if you've reached Champ standard without riding against lower Champ riders? There's a reason riders don't jump straight up from the NJL or MDL to the Champ as they'd be miles off the pace, hopefully a stronger NL bridges that gap?
    2 points
  21. But the chairman INSISTS all clubs are paying the set rate of ยฃ15 a point for no.1 and ยฃ10 a point everyone else, so it must be true ! ๐Ÿ˜‰
    2 points
  22. Of course its not a competition. I was commenting on how much better it looked imo, especially with the hosts questions/comments being quite succinct and brief and the fans' names and questions for everyone to see along the bottom of the screen. Each to their own I guess......
    2 points
  23. Do yourself a favour and pop it on ignore like the rest of us. Simon Lambert was/is an excellent mentor who has a huge amount of knowledge available both technical and mechanical (though perhaps not fitness) anyone who listens and adopts any pointers he gives them will be better for it.
    2 points
  24. If they were really interested in showing the way theyโ€™d put a NDL team together instead of using this to cherry pick riders out of it for themselves.
    2 points
  25. Meeting starts 8.30pm UK time. PPV here https://www.usaspeedwayracing.com/
    1 point
  26. Someone had to say it
    1 point
  27. No. An assessed 8.00 is an assessed 8.00 It's not a GSA of 8.00 from 2025, which would attract a 2.5% discount.
    1 point
  28. Possible???? 1. R. Lambert 7.81 2. J. Jenkins 4.49 3. T. Musielak 6.63 4. D. King 6.50 5. T. Brennan 7.05 6. J. Jeppesen 4.34 7. J. Edwards (RS) = 36.82
    1 point
  29. Extra meetings now with Buxton as well
    1 point
  30. Donโ€™t think Janowski was good anywhere last year was he? Seems to have been a rider in decline for a few years now.
    1 point
  31. Thinking along lines of someone like Huckenbeck, Wozniak etc.
    1 point
  32. Ta. In that case, wouldnโ€™t touch him with a barge pole
    1 point
  33. Not sure Rew is doing UK this season, and prefer to see Lawson in the rather then Tungate, wouldn't be surprised to see Ellis back unless he's lined up for Northampton if it actually happens.
    1 point
  34. Im not going to lie, i was getting nervous ๐Ÿ˜‚
    1 point
  35. Feb 6th is National Give Kids a Smile Day... or alternatively International Day of Zero Tolerance for Female Genital Mutilation (which would wipe the smile off of anybody's face!)
    1 point
  36. I'm not concerned when it comes to Jenkins, If it wasn't for injuries then I think his GSA would be even higher tbh. Jenkins and Edwards will be the 3 & 4 Pairing for Redcar this season and more than likely the 6 & 7 pairing for Ipswich so that can only be a benefit to both Clubs. Danny King will be the worry (If signed) because Mayfield will be signing him on a GSA attained mostly @ No.2 and depending on Team Building, Danny could very well end up riding as a Heat Leader this season. A lot better options on similar GSA's like Tobi Musielak and Nicolai Klindt to name a couple.
    1 point
  37. Imagine having to spend the thick end of 200k getting something off the ground and go with a completely uninspiring team. You'll never sell that to anyone
    1 point
  38. Let's hope he can find his way to all of those venues. He gets lost at the end of his road if Sandra isn't there to show him how his satnav works.๐Ÿ˜
    1 point
  39. Why are you so certain of this may I ask? Looking at the relevant rules section it doesn't state anywhere the 25% is a one off? If he was allowed to drop back into the scheme then surely all the same rules will apply?
    1 point
  40. I didn't for one minute think he was Ippo bound, could have seen him at Northampton though.
    1 point
  41. If he was signed months ago, why on earth leave it until February the 6th to announce it? What's so special about February the 6th? ๐Ÿค”
    1 point
  42. I don't mind the points limit, just keeps the level at last year, but totally agree that minimum average should have been left at 3.00
    1 point
  43. 1 point
  44. Anyone you do like?
    1 point
  45. Hasn't stopped Jack Smith getting a "gig" year on year, has it?
    1 point
  46. It was obvious what would happen the day it was announced. Personally i think the NL limit should be 40 and leave it there, changing year on year creates a bigger mess. 40 allows a little natural average inflation to help riders progress beyond but also high enough that a decent standard of teams can be put on track. Lowest rider average should be 3.00 meaning riders have to work hard to earn and keep their place rather than being convenient low numbers.
    1 point
  47. Ooops yea I forgot that Oxford team!
    1 point
  48. Thatโ€™s the one rider I canโ€™t stand.
    1 point
  49. โ€˜ Dropping the minimum level to 2.00 is a big worry with the heat leader calibre being drafted in as i can see riders getting lapped not through falls just lackof speed and thats a worry. โ€˜ The league is becoming as big a mess as the premiership , bringing in championship 2nd strings , some of which have been around for years, and expecting new 16 year olds in their first season to mix it with them with just 5 home matches to get dialled in to any sort of home advantage is just ridiculous. Its not what this division should be doing.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy