dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Isnt that the Championship match numbers? Premiership using 20 and have been from month 1.....

Dont think the 7 day rule applies to the home side

The regs are very clear that for any riders not in the category that have or could qualify as a 2 pointer can drop no lower than 4

That would be 4 then which is the minimum for any rider aside from those who would meet the criteria to be/have been a 2 pointer

He would come in on his most recently acheived average which would be his converted most recent Championship green sheet figure

Im not offended by you questioning the math but may be by being labelled a Boro fan Average match points 9 ÷ 4 is more than 13 ÷ 6 So 2 big fat away zeroes trumps 1 in the loser column

Certainly allowable in an initial declaration but previous season average is now voided Can anyone be sure with numerous supplementary regs inserted on an ad hoc basis to firefight individual situations even months into the season.... May well depends who is asking who

Think that would fit using the point saved between Smith and Wood Josh G eligibility still a question mark though......

To be fair the line between the 2 is blurred to say the least (and that is no reflection on Neil) Some of the changes are a fiddle (no specific teams singled out) but that is not to say they are not within the rules!!

Josh G current Premiership average is 6.53 which would be 8.49 (ignoring the fact that the above 6 rule may apply as not NL eligible. Team total is over 42.50 so a multi change would need the combined total back under that limit.

Didn't realise it was a talent show as well

No - the others in the same position have had their updated Premiership average converted (BWD Kennett) His Premiership average would need to be under 6 though as he is not NL eeligible

Depends if you have had the injury replacement period extended - or indeed whether Graversen was even an injury replacement in the first place as the r/r facility was the original 28 day agreement

Impossible to calculate unless you have the full spreadsheet and know which meetings are dropping off for each set of rolling figures (and remember to reduce the sample size by 2 each month)

Hang on just a bit - If Boro beat the Witches on Sunday they will have the best 2nd placed record and will make the semis We will do our best to beat the pussycats at the showground but dont put your life savings on it!

Whitfield?

Reckon it will be dogs this time Any experience with them Baldy?

Just ignore me when it comes to Kings of England Pob and we may improve on 3rd.....

Isnt it a facility for the day of the meeting only for Longtrack Doesnt cover travel/practice days as it would for a Speedway event

Respect your opinion Phil However my point was would trying have improved the chances. Even if the odds were 1 in a million by your thinking they only had to be improved to 1 in 999,999 to be a better option

The only way to argue that the fend for yourself tactic was correct is if you genuinely believe that Tai trying to team ride would've HINDERED Lamberts chances of passing Emil Is anyone prepared to say they believe that to be the case??

Being passed by Emil was irrelevant - it would've meant 2nd place just the same as his heat win Attempting the team ride even if it had a 1 in 100 chance of coming off was a 1 in 100 greater chance than taking the heat win provided of lifting the title

At least the Poles didnt win. I dont mean that because it was the Poles but only due to the position they were in A pair a full 10 points behind in the qualifiers still having a chance to win with two 3-3 drawn heats is just plain wrong!

Hugely proud of the GB performance even though hugely disappointed with the final Definitely a tactical blunder - better to have gone down to a 5-1 trying to manipulate Emil into last place than not try anything Perhaps a rule change should be that the semi final qualifiers should have to beat the top qualifiers in order to win. There should be some advantage for finishing top of the qualifier scores

If Robbo goes to 1 then will it be greatly different? As good and exciting as he is would you really expect him to win too many heat 1 ,13 and 15 away? Granted I doubt anyone would be questioning his effort even if running a 3rd but there would likely still be a few 3rds despite that