dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

3 of those are fine by me but as for the 4th - anyone but Holder!!

Yes - a no facility facility

Re Kus on a 3.80 see below 16.2.5 The Assessed MA's for new Riders to the SGB Premiership & Championship League racing is: Cat 1 as per the grading List Cat 2 as per grading list Cat 3 2.00 16.2.6 No rider with a current or previously assessed MA, other than a category 3 rider, can drop below 4.00 at any time during the season.

Wiped out by Smolinski. Still a bit battered from the crash with Danny. Fingers crossed he will be fit for Thursday

Bet365 have Witches EF above 12 at evens

Pussycats by 40 Witches plan to scupper future Boro changes

Hope it is just a simple collarbone - although that would be a bit boring for Kyle! He doesnt usually do straightforward injuries! All the best fella - be back soon

Any news on Kyle?

Just doing the job asked to perfection.....

Shouldve had the conviction to see it through and called the bluff of the Championship then....

Is his nickname sacrificial?

Regular local radio coverage in Suffolk too for both Ipswich and Mildenhall

All of the content is also available immediately online free of charge

Thankfully dont have that problem in Ipswich Full page previews and match reports, large colour photos, weekly captains column Regular other pieces outside matchdays even during the close season

Isnt that the Championship match numbers? Premiership using 20 and have been from month 1.....

Dont think the 7 day rule applies to the home side

The regs are very clear that for any riders not in the category that have or could qualify as a 2 pointer can drop no lower than 4

That would be 4 then which is the minimum for any rider aside from those who would meet the criteria to be/have been a 2 pointer

He would come in on his most recently acheived average which would be his converted most recent Championship green sheet figure

Im not offended by you questioning the math but may be by being labelled a Boro fan Average match points 9 ÷ 4 is more than 13 ÷ 6 So 2 big fat away zeroes trumps 1 in the loser column

Certainly allowable in an initial declaration but previous season average is now voided Can anyone be sure with numerous supplementary regs inserted on an ad hoc basis to firefight individual situations even months into the season.... May well depends who is asking who

Think that would fit using the point saved between Smith and Wood Josh G eligibility still a question mark though......

To be fair the line between the 2 is blurred to say the least (and that is no reflection on Neil) Some of the changes are a fiddle (no specific teams singled out) but that is not to say they are not within the rules!!

Josh G current Premiership average is 6.53 which would be 8.49 (ignoring the fact that the above 6 rule may apply as not NL eligible. Team total is over 42.50 so a multi change would need the combined total back under that limit.

Didn't realise it was a talent show as well