dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

There was no mention of anything aside from no warning and no restarts

Warnings scrapped and no restarts is what was stated Nothing about what will happen to the rider though. They may just get away with it or they could be excluded retrospectively...... As ever no clarity

Its only 56 names - would've thought that was a walk in the park for MFF

Look out for the Premiership teams that have a 4 point hole to finalise their team You could find a new Dane or Swede will this year fill that gap....

In recent history regulation updates re protests and when the can be made about line ups and facilities etc have been positive with set timescales added to prevent it happening as the meeting is about to start and avoid the need to amend results It shows that where there us a will 'loopholes' can be simply and effectively closed The biggest issue now is around averages and assessments which could almost as easily be dealt with The difference IMO is there does not seem to be the will to do it as all involved want to benefit from a ringer where they can....

He is not a super anything.....

Just wait for the first set of averages and he will be.....

I wouldnt expect a reply let alone an answer...

not just were....

Which then had a domino effect on Sheffield and Berwick it seems

http://www.milduraindependent.com/index.php/sport/5530-justin-sedgmen-hospitalised-in-newcastle-breaks-collarbone-in-three-places Re Sedge Wells and other falls/injury

Erik Riss is ready to be a 'real' no1 Mark Riss and Andersson will both be big improvers and Pickering will add a bit too Edinburgh wont be too far away and will certainly be competitive

Looks like the line up will need to change http://www.milduraindependent.com/index.php/sport/5530-justin-sedgmen-hospitalised-in-newcastle-breaks-collarbone-in-three-places

Sacrificial lamb about May time....

Cheers Gambo Can see some teams in the Championship using the League Cup to manipulate changes for the main event of a play off push then

And it was still a bit closer to being accurate than the first paragraph

Indeed arnieg everything still seems up in the air - I just couldnt recall seeing any indication either way about the return or otherwise To not bring rolling averages back would be another backward step for me

Has there been any confirmation that rolling averages will return and if so the number of meetings to be used etc

Will be an 8 when a further raft of amendments are ratified in the new year

It was Merry Xmas but 1 letter each on a different clubs thread

GB has 2 places in the SEC qualifiers for 2018 anyway. Would expect Lambert to want/get one of those

Doesnt that assume CH will be at Poole - there is still space elsewhere....

Thats an echo of the replies to any casting doubts re KK 12 months ago...

It was in Pooles interest to help. If the ban remained as it was they couldnt use him, loan him out or sell him.