Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Members
  • Posts

    18,224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

Everything posted by dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

  1. Easy done - would be better if the website was updated to remove the out of date info.
  2. What is there to protest about? He either qualifies or he doesnt If he does then he is 5.2 going by the agreed format (whether that format is right or wrong is a totally different issue)
  3. How many ladders has Max Clegg walked under since the end of last season.......
  4. So Lakesides team has not been ratified and they have been forced into a change following an SCB ruling that the averages agreed following the agm for the reserve pair was wrong Not exactly the same situation to Pooles announced team but shows that reassessments are possible even at this late stage where common sense is applied......
  5. Bowtell in at Lakeside in place of Clegg due to ruling that Zach W and Morley cannot use their 2016 2nd tier averages
  6. So they to compile a list of 260+ riders worldwide who MAY be available to ride in Britain (even though over 200 wont) and manage to NOT include the 1 rider Edinburgh want to use How dodgy is that..... Even given that - there is an obvious precedent set by the 260+ list as to where any mystery newcomer should fit without any dispute
  7. Why should there be a vote The rider qualifies for a visa or not from the criteria set out Is he on the 260+ list? If not why the feck not.....
  8. True - he can at times nail his team mates so the opposition should be no problem....
  9. Wonder what the bookies will price a Sarj double max at.......
  10. Looking at the fixture list unless League Cup meetings count towards averages it could be July before 'new' averages come into force Could be all too late by then.....
  11. Disagree - Worrall should be 6.55 Its Clegg that shouldnt be 2
  12. Others havent been awarded revised averages from less than 8 meetings so I wouldnt say that is definite. Cleggs is the 1 that seems to have been but again not confirmed as ratified anywhere yet.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy