dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Now that is total bull

You obviously feel far more strongly over this matter than I do which is why Im less inclined to defend a position Ultimately there are far more important things to get worked up about than 1 rider missing a hastily arranged friendly, even one tagged as a test match

Almost right - no rider full stop - not just reserves

There isnt a right or wrong in this case - only opinions

Jarek a Polish licence and at least £5k a meeting more than we could afford Huckenbeck I thought had ruled out Britain in favour of concentrating continental commitments

Swindon / Thursdays ??

Any Premiership rider brought in has to British upto 6.84 (converted 8.90 available) or average under 6 if not British (7.8 converted) I dont think there are any British riders left that fit the criteria and any non Brit is giving up at least a point from the team building total Guests and even r/r seems better on the face of it unless theres something small and fluffy lurking in someones headgear......

Danny very unlikely to ride again this season https://ipswichwitches.co/no-immediate-return-for-king/

Its not that unusual for riders to book short breaks like this - who can blame them its a tough regime for the top boys. Its rarely happens that late changes like this cause problems

Consistent decisions at least - very much the same reasoning as Jacobs in the past

You wouls love Wallinger - get in quick

That would be about 2.7 in Prem Isnt that still above Smith?

Poole are starting to produce what was expected from the start of the season and now look to be in pole position to not only reach the play offs but dictate the way they are shaped by finishing top

You may find the post boring but it was the truth Poor meeting - little worthwhile racing/passing

Nah - Im more than happy with the point Ive made I'll leave you to your fantasy world of attracting back the stars with the shirt buttons available

Any news on the Aussie team line up yet?

Not correct - FIM sanctioned international calender priority applies

Tune in next week for the next episode

The granting of said facility would be the breaking of the rules Going back to my previous example of a team wanting to track a team totalling 42.51 - if the MC were to sanction it would you regard that as not breaking the rules? How about a double change using the combined average of the 2 riders rather than coming back under the limit. Thats not within the rules but hey lets just get the MC to sanction it..... problem solved

None yet and none if Josh rides at Leicester None if he rides in Poland and a no facility guest is used None if he rides in Poland and a full facilty is used but Josh is given a 28 day ban Only if he rides in Poland Poole use a full facility and no further action is taken are any rules broken

Isnt the addition at home 5% (actually I see your calculation is 5%) However I dont think it applies to reserves

Poole of course have had control of the situation by choosing to sign and retain a rider on a Polish licence - just the same as where clubs have had to deal with the Denmark situation The regs re any facility or not should therefore be followed - to not do so is just plain wrong What next - a club wants to sign a rider but it takes them to 42.51. Should that club just say "Dont penalise us - he wasnt riding for us when he scored those points so it was outside our control" Sounds ridiculous? Yes it does - but ignore one regulation and where does it stop......

The customer buying the steak (top riders) in my example is the restuarant (club) There isnt the money for it to be on the menu regardless as diner demand is too low Even if you lose those that will only eat steak the restaurant can no longer provide it

I think you are deliberately ignoring the underlying point in my analogy.....

There is no 'ride under protest' option The decision has to be made before and is then final according to the regs Mind you if you can ignore one reg then why not another and then another Eventually why bother at all....