Gavan

Please say how he is a foolish idiot regarding this matter?? Is Klindt poor at the NSS Is Bates better at the NSS Come back with the answer please Spot on Lisa. Klindt has scored 6 (from 7 rides) 5 and 3 in his 3 visits there. Bates got 9 this season.(from 7 rides including 2 engine failures so basically 9 from 5) As stated Bates for Klindt at Wimborne Road is a loss for Poole Bates for Klindt at the NSS is not a loss for Poole, if anything it makes them stronger Surely you must get fed up reading the tripe from Shovlar , backed up by the clown like a little lapdog. 99% of the Poole fans on this thread know and realise that Poole are stronger tonight having Bates , but were weaker the other night with the same change.

So if ive bitten , you obviously feel its acceptable for Shovlar to troll away then? His posts are either serious an meant ...in which case his opinion differs from everyone else. Or he is trolling to get a reaction

Wells wasnt as good as ive seen him and Mark Riss was poor as well. The reserves should have done better , Clegg in particular. Masters was solid and Erik Riss looks very very good. Pickering deserved more and is a neat little rider

Your entitled to your view but..........King didnt lay it down he picked up drive and disappeared under the air fence..........much the same way Sedgman did earlier.

Wow im honoured lol is that the first time we have agreed? Yes you can compare as they both raced Dan Bewley Nope your Holder / Newman analogy is wrong as one is a heat leader and one isnt. Newman goes well at Monmore but would i want him replacing my number one.......no. Bates is replacing a rider in the same position as him so its easy to compare. Both Klindt and Bates are number sixes for their team. Klindt over Bates at 99% of track i agree................but the NSS isnt one of them Oh and are you calling Lisa a numpty????

Nobody is saying he is Just shows your lack of knowledge about the sport. Riders go better on certain tracks thats a fact not opinion. Bates is half a point behind Klindt in the averages anyway. Is Dan Bewley a better rider than Klindt?? Nope but he beat him both times they met at the NSS......Oops and Bates beat Bewley twice when he rode there. I wouldnt expect Bewley to get anywhere near Klindt at Poole and on other tracks but at the NSS he is the better rider Do you not understand that a rider is better on some tracks then others lol Crap comparison as well Holder and Newman lol. Ones a number one and one a second string. So your saying you would have a rider who has scored 6, 5 and 3..........over a rider who got 9 there? Klindt has been awful at the NSS..............is it only you that cant see it? If Bates scores less than 6 from 7 rides then you can say you missed Klindt

I cant believe that the guy who did the monarchs report Graham someone could have been at the meeting myself. Never seen such a one sided biased report in my life. Mentions the fall of Pickering costing 2 points..........but fails to mention that the fall of Sedgman cost the witches 2 points. Mentions that the track was difficult and the Witches were winning from the gate.......true...but in the first 7 heats the only Witch to win a race was King Heat number 4 and we lose our most potent reserve. Then onto heat 13.............King unbeaten and quite frankly nobody had got near him.......touches the tapes and goes off 15 metres only to fall and be excluded. So the luck there is with the Monarchs that King is out of the race. Then this reporter mentions it was unlucky as the Monarchs were on a 5-1 at the time................forgets to mention that Schlein decided to let them lead in the re run before passing them both.......remember on a track with no passing....Masters passed Sedgman and Schlein passed both Monarchs. No mention that Mark Riss was incapable of getting past Connor Mountain when it mattered. So yes Monarchs lost points when Pickering fell But... Ipswich did when Sedgman fell Ipswich did when Greaves was ruled out Ipswich did when King was excluded. Are all Monarchs reports on their website this biased??

Felt like i was watching most of the Wolves boys last night at Ipswich, Masters, Riss, Schlein and Greaves all in action. Cracking race with Schlein and Masters neither giving an inch

Well put, always nice to debate with someone sensible. I think Batch is a better option then Zengota in my opinion. Newman was poor last night...but yet i get blasted for saying that by you know who........i hope for Kyles sake he turns it around soon

Who would you rather have had? Batchelor scored 13 there this season in the individual meeting. Zengota has never rode there so i would say thats a darn good replacement. Throw into the mix that Bates is better than Klindt round there , along with Belle Vue struggling to win at home, along with Hans riding, and i would say Poole are favourites now to win this meeting. Remember Belle Vue scrapped home against Swindon and Leicester and lost to Somerset, 3 teams worse than Poole.

I guess they do. Lets be fair as we have always said there isnt a lot else for people in Poole to got to. And history always tells us that if the Poole fans dont like what they are seeing or the team is struggling they dont bother going. Support your club through good and bad.

He did, was very impressed how quickly he sized the place up...........looks a good prospect

have a little look to see how he got half of his points then come back to me. the 2 races he scored in he was paid for 5......... I want him to do well.....he rides for my team! fact is in his first 2 races he was a long last until 3 riders fell! was involved in a good 5-1 and looked like the old Kyle Newman but was then left in heat 14 by a youngster on his first ever visit to the place. Sedgman has been criticised on the Ipswich pages but im yet to see Belle Vue fans come on the Ipswich threads moaning

Your correct it isn't. However in his first ride he was a long last then Pickering fell so 1 point paid for 2 In his second race he was last when Riss fell and then Sedgman fell so another 2 points Had a great ride in his third race then got left easily by Pickering in his last ride. KING - had 4 easy wins but a tape touch and fall probably cost him the full house HEEPS- first 2 quite poor but then involved in 2 big 5-1's that ultimately won us the meeting SEDGMAN - silly fall in his second ride but bounced back after with 2 wins NEWMAN - struggled but played a part in an important 5-1 SCHLEIN - slow start but what a ride in heat 13 passing both Monarchs MOUNTAIN - does struggle with the track but also involved in a good 5-1 to change the meeting in heat 8 GREAVES - unlucky tonight but we got by without him MASTERS - solid but not spectacular, good pass on Sedgman but gave way to Schlein in heat 13 M RISS - I expected better, not on the pace, fair play cleared the track when he fell even though his own rider wasn't winning E RISS - great showing, so smooth and will be a number one very soon, missed out in heat 15 but for me Monarchs best rider PICKERING - this boy can ride. on a 5-1 before falling on the last lap, and very quick in 14 when leading. a must for next season WELLS - for someone who rides Foxhall well thought he was poor tonight CLEGG - good win in heat 2 but ineffective afterwards DAVEY - poor , don't think he liked the track

grow up you pathetic little man. I want my team to show some effort. In his first 2 races he was last and way behind and 3 riders fell off. In his last ride he gated and held of Wells very well. He should win Heat 14 and then he will have done his job. If you don't mind your team not trying that's down to you

that he rides for you as well as us. He has so far only beat riders who have fallen off in front of him. Lack of effort as well. If Poole makes changes he has to go and I don't think we will have him for to much longer To be fair Poole usually get good crowds......but they are fickle and go missing very quickly

Didn't expect Newman to be this poor. No effort at all

Kyle Newman looking like a novice in the first at Ipswich tonight half a lap behind!

Got here just in time! Bloody A12 lol

they cancelled each other out and Poole only just scrapped home. Wolves over 2 legs would be hot favourites. Poole need to make changes

Poole biggest issue was signing KK. If you haven't got that number one that you can rely on for double figures then you are always in trouble. Zengota isn't a number one been then again neither is KK. The form of Newman is a big concern.

Troll away buddy!

think its just Shovlar who just talks his usual crap the other Poole fans see the real story

got that trolling fishing rod out again I see! you are the only person on here saying that it was an unlikely victory................everyone else knows Poole should have won it comfortably You missed Klindt so add another 7 on your score...........Wolves missed Lindgren so add another 7 on their score. Please please tell me your trolling......................even you aren't thick enough to believe what you wrote

Poor choice of guest cost Wolves there. For Poole to only win by 2 shows there are some issues in that team namely Shanes and Newman and the lack of a number one. Not sure what's up with Matt Ford this season not on the ball when needing to make changes. Good point for Wolves on a track they usually struggle on and Masters and Thorsell never go well there and the reserves were poor.