SUPERACE Posted 19 hours ago Report Share Posted 19 hours ago I didnt watch it live, but i haven't seen a single picture yet that shows the wheel was over the line. It was obviously very tight, but not enough for an exclusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted 19 hours ago Report Share Posted 19 hours ago 2 minutes ago, SUPERACE said: I didnt watch it live, but i haven't seen a single picture yet that shows the wheel was over the line. It was obviously very tight, but not enough for an exclusion. So you think it could be bias against Poole, who would have thought that and David Howe's unbiased assessment was that he saw the wheel was over the line during the race. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beardybum Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago (edited) To be honest as a Glasgow fan I don't have a dog in the race. Yes maybe he was over the line but from every replay the ref saw last night there is no way he could say 100 percent.......so he can't exclude him. Edited 17 hours ago by beardybum 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
False dawn Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago From the Edinburgh website: "Yet another change has been forced upon the Monarchs for our final Scottish Cup meeting on Friday as Michael Palm Toft, after riding well in Scunthorpe's brave Playoff Final performance, suffered an injury following the Superheat" Elsewhere on the same website: "....replacing the previously announced Michael Palm Toft, who was involved in a post-race incident after Scunthorpe's contentious Super Heat loss in the Championship play-off final at Poole last night" Anyone know what happened to MPT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grachan Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago Just reading about this "controversy", so I had a look at the Scunthorpe website. This is the picture on there: Being the Scunthorpe website - and along with a claim in the match report that the wheel was over the line - this would, presumably, be the most "over the line" point in the race. And the whole wheel is quite obviously not entirely over the line. So where is the controversy? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 30 minutes ago, Grachan said: Just reading about this "controversy", so I had a look at the Scunthorpe website. This is the picture on there: Being the Scunthorpe website - and along with a claim in the match report that the wheel was over the line - this would, presumably, be the most "over the line" point in the race. And the whole wheel is quite obviously not entirely over the line. So where is the controversy? To me it’s inconclusive and if it was over line it was a millisecond and at the angle he was travelling it was a difficult decision for the Ref.Think got it right not to exclude though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 11 hours ago, False dawn said: From the Edinburgh website: "Yet another change has been forced upon the Monarchs for our final Scottish Cup meeting on Friday as Michael Palm Toft, after riding well in Scunthorpe's brave Playoff Final performance, suffered an injury following the Superheat" Elsewhere on the same website: "....replacing the previously announced Michael Palm Toft, who was involved in a post-race incident after Scunthorpe's contentious Super Heat loss in the Championship play-off final at Poole last night" Anyone know what happened to MPT? Loading bike into Van sounds a good excuse🤔😂😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 12 hours ago, False dawn said: From the Edinburgh website: "Yet another change has been forced upon the Monarchs for our final Scottish Cup meeting on Friday as Michael Palm Toft, after riding well in Scunthorpe's brave Playoff Final performance, suffered an injury following the Superheat" Elsewhere on the same website: "....replacing the previously announced Michael Palm Toft, who was involved in a post-race incident after Scunthorpe's contentious Super Heat loss in the Championship play-off final at Poole last night" Anyone know what happened to MPT? Possibly choked on his dummy!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trackrat Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 16 hours ago, SteveLyric2 said: I thought he already was!! What a boring silly old man💦💦 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur54 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 56 minutes ago, Trackrat said: What a boring silly old man💦💦 How's the grapes 🍇 glug glug glug 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucifer sam Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, Grachan said: Just reading about this "controversy", so I had a look at the Scunthorpe website. This is the picture on there: Being the Scunthorpe website - and along with a claim in the match report that the wheel was over the line - this would, presumably, be the most "over the line" point in the race. And the whole wheel is quite obviously not entirely over the line. So where is the controversy? The actual rule is: 012.1.11 Leaving the Track A rider whose machine crosses the inner edge of the track with 2 wheels must be disqualified unless, in the opinion of the Referee, the action was taken in the interests of safety for other riders or the rider involved was forced off course by another rider. I would say the wheel does go entirely over the line (remember speedway tyres are not exactly wide), but it didn't need to, in any case. It's just whether both wheels had crossed the inner edge (in other words, both wheels are entirely or partially on the centre green). Both wheels quite clearly do. Note the word "must" unless taken in the interests of safety. I don't think passing another rider counts as the interests of safety. It's an automatic exclusion - both wheels were on the centre green. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalan Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 33 minutes ago, lucifer sam said: The actual rule is: 012.1.11 Leaving the Track A rider whose machine crosses the inner edge of the track with 2 wheels must be disqualified unless, in the opinion of the Referee, the action was taken in the interests of safety for other riders or the rider involved was forced off course by another rider. I would say the wheel does go entirely over the line (remember speedway tyres are not exactly wide), but it didn't need to, in any case. It's just whether both wheels had crossed the inner edge (in other words, both wheels are entirely or partially on the centre green). Both wheels quite clearly do. Note the word "must" unless taken in the interests of safety. I don't think passing another rider counts as the interests of safety. It's an automatic exclusion - both wheels were on the centre green. Speak to any SCB official and they will tell you both wheels must have crossed the inner white line. Another rule that will be re written I bet 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
therefused Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 54 minutes ago, Catalan said: Speak to any SCB official and they will tell you both wheels must have crossed the inner white line. Another rule that will be re written I bet to be honest its totally irrelvant what an SCB offical says when its written down in black and white in the rulebook. maybe it will be rewritten which is fine, but its not been rewritten yet and the current rulebook should be adhered too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucifer sam Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Catalan said: Speak to any SCB official and they will tell you both wheels must have crossed the inner white line. Another rule that will be re written I bet Both wheels did cross over the white line. But it's whether they have to cross over 100%. I think they did on Wednesday in any case, but the rule doesn't even stipulate that they have to. Both wheels were over the line for probably up to 1 second. Both wheels were 100% over the line for probably only 0.1% of a second (when all the soft soil on the inside of the line was kicked up, with the other evidence being the rear tyre track that Ryan Ingram took photos of). Edited 2 hours ago by lucifer sam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucifer sam Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, therefused said: to be honest its totally irrelvant what an SCB offical says when its written down in black and white in the rulebook. maybe it will be rewritten which is fine, but its not been rewritten yet and the current rulebook should be adhered too Exactly. Any future rule didn't count on Wednesday. Just the current one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago Does not matter now, meeting over decision made. Poole are champions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFCB Wildcat Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, lucifer sam said: but it didn't need to, in any case. It's just whether both wheels had crossed the inner edge (in other words, both wheels are entirely or partially on the centre green). That's your interpretation, but that's not what the rule says. If that was the intent, then the rule must say "partially on the centre geen" or " if any part of the wheel is over the line" As it is, you can't have crossed anything if you are still partially on it. The rule is hard enough to police as it is. How could referees possibly judge if a part of a tyre is over the edge of a line in real time. I'm not saying that he definitely didn't cross the line, I'm saying that there is no conclusive evidence either way, so the referee couldn't exclude him. You would need a shot that showed a clear gap between the white line and the edge of the wheel to be sure and I've yet to see one a genuine one. I don't accept any of the AI enhanced photos that have appeared on here that seek to prove it either way. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucifer sam Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, AFCB Wildcat said: That's your interpretation, but that's not what the rule says. If that was the intent, then the rule must say "partially on the centre geen" or " if any part of the wheel is over the line" As it is, you can't have crossed anything if you are still partially on it. The rule is hard enough to police as it is. How could referees possibly judge if a part of a tyre is over the edge of a line in real time. I'm not saying that he definitely didn't cross the line, I'm saying that there is no conclusive evidence either way, so the referee couldn't exclude him. You would need a shot that showed a clear gap between the white line and the edge of the wheel to be sure and I've yet to see one a genuine one. I don't accept any of the AI enhanced photos that have appeared on here that seek to prove it either way. It's not my interpretation at all - THIS is the rule (which was clearly broken): 012.1.11 Leaving the Track A rider whose machine crosses the inner edge of the track with 2 wheels must be disqualified unless, in the opinion of the Referee, the action was taken in the interests of safety for other riders or the rider involved was forced off course by another rider. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catalan Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, lucifer sam said: It's not my interpretation at all - THIS is the rule (which was clearly broken): 012.1.11 Leaving the Track A rider whose machine crosses the inner edge of the track with 2 wheels must be disqualified unless, in the opinion of the Referee, the action was taken in the interests of safety for other riders or the rider involved was forced off course by another rider. looks like you will have agree to disagree. An SCB official deemed that both wheels never crossed the inner edge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
therefused Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 33 minutes ago, foreverblue said: Does not matter now, meeting over decision made. Poole are champions. Of course it matters, refereeing has been shocking in this country for years now and it’s getting worse, an investigation needs to happen into the standard of refereeing. This is just the tip of the iceberg and has robbed the rightful winners of a league title Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.