How about this for a 40 point limit with only 1 rider over 8, think some of the rider are unlikely but an just an idea of a team structure (hope I got the averages right). Bomber 8.90 Flint 6.95 Nagel 7.39 Harrison 4.97 Zischke 5.43 Hagon 3.52 Hodder 2.63   39.79 Or Bomber 8.90 Flint 6.95 Howarth 7.92 Kevin JP 5.00 Harrison 4.97 Hagon 3.52 Hodder 2.63   39.89

The AGM has nearly always been a jolly, if you believe the talk that most clubs are struggling financially, why do they most years, agree to go to foreign places costing many hundreds/ thousands of £ss  ?  This is not the 1st time it's been held in rugby, doing this at most a night in the local Travelodge is the cost

How do you know it is financially viable for Glasgow to step up? Or do you just think the owners have sufficient financial assets to sustain a loss? 

True. So Tenerife just a jolly then or maybe can't be justified this year under the current circumstances.

It is financially viable for Glasgow to move up, They just refuse to do it. Championship is a League set up for clubs like Plymouth who operate on a very tight budget. Championship isn't a League that was set up for clubs like Glasgow who try and sign as many HL's as the rules allow them too whilst leaving lower end Championship clubs to scrap around for No.1's and No.5's, They're called money bags Glasgow for a reason, Signing riders like Tarasenko and Nagel at Championship level proves that. Let Glasgow have the Berwick and Edinburgh meetings still as challenge meetings on the side of Premiership and Premiership KO Cup meetings. Everything about Glasgow is Premiership level, Glasgow competing in the Championship is the equivalent of Chelsea FC competing in the Europa Conference League last season imo.

posted... but now out of date