Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Members
  • Posts

    17,621
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Everything posted by dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

  1. Perhaps its the bus pass age that needs changing rather than the speedway....
  2. This forum, especially during the winter, is fuelled by rumour and speculation. Both are fair game and indeed often provide an important opening for interesting debate However I agree some topics are best kept private I was aware of isues with the Panthers heat leader deals being signed off in mid December but felt it was too sensitive an issue to raise on here at that time from just hearsay. I actually thought it most likely it would all blow over and come to nothing I dont think there are many on here that spread deliberate untruths. Usually there is some base substance even to the strangest rumour but situations are complex and develop and the final details presented publically will be 'the party line' regardless of what actually went on.That in itself is not wrong as rightly some things are private Before the rise of social media of course it would only be this final version that 99% got to see
  3. Not so sure he wasnt good enough but when you get the same whether you score 7 or17 .......
  4. Poole/play off Harris would be good addition Glasgow/Rye House Harris would not Given that the likelyhood of Lynn not using Iversen if he rides Uk being zero as is the chance of them releasing Riss then Harris is IMO the best option in the absence of attracting a big overseas signing
  5. But the controller of 1 of the little pots doesnt have full access to the big pot or either of the other smaller pots.....
  6. Fag packet calculation is 5.72 if no reductions apply 6.24 if reductions apply - which would be 6.4 should a reduction also apply with the last rider named
  7. 3 separate clubs 3 separate pots Its not like the Dingles on Emmerdale where theres a pot on the mantlepiece with everyone putting tenners in and out!
  8. Lynn have their No1 tied up so your logic is sound if he goes there Ipswich still have their premium No1 budget available.......
  9. Its a little unfair to expect each and every decision to be explained on here There should I agree though be more clear and consistent information centrally re the fundamentals
  10. For me many of the posts reacting to this are reading far too much into it re 'corruption' and 'control' Just because it is only announced now it doesnt mean its just blown up in the last few days It may now look like Buster is trying to move the pieces due to Ipswich not having found a top end when infact the issue was known right from the outset and unrelated
  11. Harris must be the favourite in the frame now Assuming that with him on 7.59 (after reduction) what do we have left taking into account that would mean the others DO get a reduction as well
  12. Indeed - missed that one I will kick Beerhut accordingly for supplying duff information
  13. Unless the true reason is average miscalculation.....
  14. Even taking reductions for Harris and Cook makes the total 0.02 over rounding up the conversions...
  15. Yes - if you found out we would need to make sure you couldnt repeat it Horses head on pillow sort of deal ☺
  16. For Tungate to fit the reductions have to apply as first expected So the removal of reduction yheory would be a red herring if he is the replacement
  17. IMO even Brunel wouldnt have been able to build the bridge needed to see Tungate back at Ipswich......
  18. Sometimes there is more to it than simple maths.....
  19. Fair play pussycats - you cant beat this thread for controversy and drama
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy