Fromafar Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 30 minutes ago, blue witch said: Keep 15 heats but just do 2 nominated races. Reserves only 3 rides each and it would make it more worth the money seeing the big guys an extra time each. Should adopt the TS rules of Poland too. I also agree just have a superheat/run off for agg purposes The Polish formula seems to work well. Hence it won’t be adopted here. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The White Knight Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago Silly idea in my opinion. a Draw is a Draw - and that should be it. Typical Speedway. Why make it straightforward when you can complicate it. 🙄 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullmax Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 16 minutes ago, The White Knight said: Silly idea in my opinion. a Draw is a Draw - and that should be it. Typical Speedway. Why make it straightforward when you can complicate it. 🙄 You've hit the nail on the head. Change for change sake. Even the super heat was a 3-3 draw !!! Plus you need to have an A level in mathematics to understand the league table nowadays. I take it you could actually win the league without winning a single meeting all season with this points scoring system Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teromaafan Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, blue witch said: Keep 15 heats but just do 2 nominated races. Reserves only 3 rides each and it would make it more worth the money seeing the big guys an extra time each. Should adopt the TS rules of Poland too. I also agree just have a superheat/run off for agg purposes How do the Polish TS rules differ to ours out of interest? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavan Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago This will sound daft after last night but a superheat the vast majority of the time will favour the home team thus making the away teams riders get nothing for their efforts all night Especially worse on an aggregate score … for example Ipswich could beat Belle Vue by 20 in the home leg…. Then lose by 20 in the away leg yet the ‘superheat’ is held only at one track where the second leg is and huge home advantage … this is not a pop at Belle Vue because the first leg could be at Belle Vue and then Ipswich get a superheat at Foxhall where Doyle and Emil are clear favourites in the second leg 90-90 over 30 heats and yet one race decides on who goes to the final at the HOME teams track feels wrong I don’t know the answer … you could say race wins but that would stop team riding Maybe match races by this I mean 7 more heats 1v1 against your opposing number and one team would get 4 wins I don’t know I read what I wrote and that seems silly a bit lol Anyone think of any ideas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedway102285 Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago Simple If tied after heat 15, Then its Rock Paper Scissors to decide ...... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 52 minutes ago, Gavan said: This will sound daft after last night but a superheat the vast majority of the time will favour the home team thus making the away teams riders get nothing for their efforts all night Especially worse on an aggregate score … for example Ipswich could beat Belle Vue by 20 in the home leg…. Then lose by 20 in the away leg yet the ‘superheat’ is held only at one track where the second leg is and huge home advantage … this is not a pop at Belle Vue because the first leg could be at Belle Vue and then Ipswich get a superheat at Foxhall where Doyle and Emil are clear favourites in the second leg 90-90 over 30 heats and yet one race decides on who goes to the final at the HOME teams track feels wrong I don’t know the answer … you could say race wins but that would stop team riding Maybe match races by this I mean 7 more heats 1v1 against your opposing number and one team would get 4 wins I don’t know I read what I wrote and that seems silly a bit lol Anyone think of any ideas If level on aggregate, neither team gets the bonus point? 2 x 20 points home wins would still give an exciting climax with both teams chasing the bonus point. Then even if one team, can't gain the extra point, a 5-1 could prevent the opposition gaining it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PersonalResponsibility Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago It's the aggregate super heat that I don't really get. How can you have 2 different meetings on 2 different tracks and then have the decider on one the club's home track? Especially in a sport as poorly organised as speedway when there's any amount of reasons as to why meetings could be rearranged/rescheduled, again giving one side an advantage. As for the super heat for a draw on the night...why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PersonalResponsibility Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago It's the aggregate super heat that I don't really get. How can you have 2 different meetings on 2 different tracks and then have the decider on one the club's home track? Especially in a sport as poorly organised as speedway when there's any amount of reasons as to why meetings could be rearranged/rescheduled, again giving one side an advantage. As for the super heat for a draw on the night...why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebv Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Have two bonus points for an aggregate win (treat it as winning one 30 heat meeting) and have one point each for a drawn aggregate score.... Or put a dart board on the centre green and play nearest the bull... Edited 2 hours ago by mikebv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouch Posted 42 minutes ago Report Share Posted 42 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Gavan said: Especially worse on an aggregate score … for example Ipswich could beat Belle Vue by 20 in the home leg…. Then lose by 20 in the away leg yet the ‘superheat’ is held only at one track where the second leg is and huge home advantage … this is not a pop at Belle Vue because the first leg could be at Belle Vue and then Ipswich get a superheat at Foxhall where Doyle and Emil are clear favourites in the second leg That happened to us in the KO cup last season. We drew with Sheffield over 30 races then they had the home advantage when it came to the decider. We always have the second leg for this very reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS50 Posted 41 minutes ago Report Share Posted 41 minutes ago Why is the 4 3 2 0 scoring system used?. Means avoiding last is the priority. Why not 4 2 1 0, making winning a priority. Surely winning should be a priority when you have a race with 4 riders of the quality of Emily, Doyle, Bewley and Kurtz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted 21 minutes ago Report Share Posted 21 minutes ago 18 minutes ago, RS50 said: Why is the 4 3 2 0 scoring system used?. Means avoiding last is the priority. Why not 4 2 1 0, making winning a priority. Surely winning should be a priority when you have a race with 4 riders of the quality of Emily, Doyle, Bewley and Kurtz. May as well just do a 1 vs 1 run off then if just about winning the race. Scoring system is fine the way it is as encourages team riding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.