Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/18/2024 in Posts

  1. Hi guys, belle vue fan here who is in glasgow with work. Decided the check out ashfield. What a great set up! Entrance gates open so ducked my head and there was a rider doing laps, im supposing it was Ivacic? Obviously no other riders on track but he looked rapid!
    7 points
  2. Of course I'm risking the comeback of 'you would say that' but for me if a rider witholds his services then he shouldn't be allowed to go elsewhere that season. If hes sacked then fair enough, or settles his differences and comes back for his original club but there has clearly been some underhand stuff going on here on the rider's part, however he dresses it up. Don't blame Ipswich for asking but I think the BSPL have decided correctly.
    6 points
  3. Basso withdrawn with injury at Sheffield. Honestly can’t believe this season. Considering starting a go fund me for an exorcist!!
    4 points
  4. While I agree that it's certainly unfair that clubs can drop riders but a rider will get a ban of they want to leave a club, I have no sympathy for Musielak. He said he needed a break due to injury, while still riding in Poland. Then says he's sitting out the rest of the GB season. So if he feels fit to return it should be with King's Lynn. If he's not happy there, just be honest about it.
    4 points
  5. All this criticism of Poole,but we know who has the last laugh,and it’s not all their critics on here.
    4 points
  6. Poole have a fanbase used to winning and their business model is solely based around that.. Unlike many other tracks, they actually have a fanbase to lose given the numbers they get.. Hence, they astutely know, victories keep them attending.. Come their leg of the final they will probably top 2000, which for some in the Championship is three meetings worth of attendees.. Many fans around the country attend for "the racing", Poole fans attend more for "the success" as that has been their default position for the past two decades.. Accordingly, their promoters give their punters what they want ..
    4 points
  7. It was an entirely predictable outcome. Whether we agree with Belle Vue signing Lambert to replace the injured Fricke is down to personal views. However, there was such an outcry that SCB changed the rules - and now we have the current position. Sometimes speedway reaps what it sows.
    3 points
  8. Good win for Leicester that they were proper up for it and deserved winners. King and Ellis let Ipswich down tonight. A few dangerous moves from Lawson, cook and Fricke this evening that probably crossed the line of hard/fair racing. A few times Lucky there wasn’t a nasty incident. Desperately need our heat leader replacement sorted asap and Thompson back.
    3 points
  9. Is another Belle Vue the best blueprint? I think the track is over-rated and defaults to the wide line too early. From what I've seen and heard lately, the new Swindon and Workington are better racetracks.
    3 points
  10. http://www.savecoventryspeedway.com/_mobile/news.php?extend.4307.1
    3 points
  11. All I saw was some excellent racing from both sets of riders. Heat 13 was a right belter.
    2 points
  12. How did you get a picture of my Musielak doll?
    2 points
  13. Not everything is at it seems. He may well have very valid reasons who knows.
    2 points
  14. Great to see Craig Cook back after missing the Ben Fund at his home track.
    2 points
  15. Bloody hell, we agree on something. Whatever the reason, Buster, the club or not, he should of spoke the truth.
    2 points
  16. There in lies one of Speedways problems - the truth is not always appreciated
    2 points
  17. Change the record, you just can't take it, what cheating are we on about
    2 points
  18. Glad you’ve done it. I did, but quickly deleted I’m 50/50 on this now. I totally understand where you’re coming from and I was of the same opinion as you a few weeks ago. I believe I said as much on here. But after hearing a little more I’ve changed my mind a bit. Forget all the local rivalry stuff I’m too long in the tooth for all that, I genuinely feel sorry for the loyal Lynn fans you’re all the innocent parties here, but your club is being run appallingly. Sheffield might not be giving up as easily as Ipswich. Let’s see what happens.
    2 points
  19. I don't think he is fully fit either but little choice of guests, some that were tried were unavailable and with most teams racing on Friday leaves little scope, difficult when you have 2 newbies racing as well, shame about Stevie being ill, he was coming into some great form as well
    2 points
  20. More bizarre Ben Barker thinks it's a good idea! Not such an issue for Glasgow, as we'll get him the first night.
    2 points
  21. Why? R/R is probably the best option, 6 of the 9 clubs already riding on Friday. Not much choice between Berwick, Oxford and Plymouth riders
    2 points
  22. 2 points
  23. There's a party going on right here Let's celebrate with a flat white
    2 points
  24. Agreed. When riders are prepared to attack the track we get decent races at BP. Hats off to Rew tonight because he was prepared to have a right old go. He is a long way off the finished article but clearly isn’t taken in by all the negative crap regarding the Lions track. The top riders and those who are destined to go to the top will see BP as a challenge and be mindful that the very best are able to handle the so called technical tracks. Throttle jockeys who love the big tracks (some apparently have dozens of racing lines) will have to adapt if they are to progress in the sport.
    1 point
  25. Top man!!! Much appreciated!
    1 point
  26. https://britishspeedway.co.uk/rowe-motor-oil-premiership/new-tv-fixtures-announced/
    1 point
  27. i think every 4th year is SWC
    1 point
  28. Mate, pull your dress up! That ain't rude... if you want rude head over to the Scunthorpe and Workington sections!!
    1 point
  29. Bad night. Scott, king and Ellis didn’t perform at all. Feel sorry for Emil carrying the team and it isn’t the first time (Oxford). Positives is that Rew done well. That’s the only positive.
    1 point
  30. If the will is there it would be interesting to test that legally. Regardless of the reasons a rider is released from his contract but can’t move elsewhere to earn a living as he has to remain declared in a team where he is no longer under contract. Only is speedway & highly illegal I would have thought.
    1 point
  31. I know some blame BC for everything.. But how can Buster block him. Edit... I see what you meant now. Someone has explained the rules.
    1 point
  32. Disappointed with Tobi, always had him down as a nice bloke and enjoyed watching him at Peterborough but after his article in the SS I presumed he was going back to KL imminently not back track. Not bothered about Chapman and Allitt but do feel for the fans.
    1 point
  33. McGurk has only been at Armadale once this year… and struggled. Fully expect Connor and Max to have the better of him and Celina. Interested to see how Vuolas goes but I think we should have more than enough to win this meeting.
    1 point
  34. Can see a home win here but hopefully we can keep the scores close. Coming up for this one with the Supporters club.
    1 point
  35. I’m not overly convinced Iversen had many options tbf.
    1 point
  36. Well we certainly accepted it. Surely there must have been another Saturday or Tuesday come to that and yes I know Bomber rides in Sweden on some Tuesdays. Or should we have tried to change the Armadale date instead?
    1 point
  37. I tend to agree with the principle you set out - makes a lot of sense although it effectively makes the ban for withholding a whole season rather than 28 days For that to be fair however I would say riders would argue for that to happen any rider dropped would need to be paid for the season (or until redeployed) Also bear in mind how biased the withholding services situation is towards teams. Riders can be threatened with the ban even when doing so for not paid being for weeks/months
    1 point
  38. Sedgmen assumes the average of the rider he is replacing (Musielak) so as Klindt is third in the Lynn averages the answer should be no.
    1 point
  39. On the flip side should KL still have a facility for him now the 28 days are up since his ban? They should now be looking to sign a replacement (not much out there to choose from) but that's no one else's fault
    1 point
  40. I don't think there's been a meeting where he's deserved extra rides, it's obvious Pawliki/Millik were signed JUST to tick the necessary boxes to be admitted in to the Premier, there appears to be no thought/positive team building tactics....but I agree with ALL your other points of view ! There's only been 2 decent signings at PB this season and that's Brennan and Lingdren.... Zach Cook was a promising signing....but making him the scapegoat for the poor results/performances and management ineptness, was sacrilege!
    1 point
  41. You have to wonder whether internal talks between the clubs on the 75% rule should be scrapped. There’s currently 3 clubs missing a top heatleader and struggling to replace them. Ipswich for example, have known since the end of May that Doyle was out for the season and I know for a fact they’ve tried every top line rider out there without success. They’ve been close a couple of times, but ultimately couldn’t get them over the line. Sheffield and now Lynn are now having the same issues. My understanding is that there are a couple that would be willing to come, but not before clubs reach their 75% cut off. Let’s see if this “rule” stays in place.
    1 point
  42. There is plenty of "material" on the track but certain riders want it dragged off the inside too early.
    1 point
  43. The second test at Brandon was partially covered by BBC-TV (Sportsview, I think). At the same meeting, Nigel Boocock beat Ove Fundin in the Golden Helmet. Some night that was!
    1 point
  44. It'll be interesting to see if Becker can reproduce his SoN form on Thursday.
    1 point
  45. He was badly injured at Hackney (90 ithink badly broken leg ) took a season to recover and then switched to Arena in 1991 when we won the div 2 and got prompted under Terry Russell - where he had a fairly reasonable few seasons but he never was the same rider sadly! Still good and was a much liked / valued rider at Arena. All seems so long ago, Andy Silver me fabulous rider and my first speedway hero! By my reckoning both retired in the early -mid 90s so outside the scope - apologies but good memories anyway!
    1 point
  46. Saturday live updates from 1.15pm Uk time https://live.baansportfansite.nl/event/869/european-125cc-youth-track-racing-cup-zarnovica.html Sunday live updates from 1.15pm UK time https://live.baansportfansite.nl/event/867/fim-track-racing-youth-gold-trophy-zarnovica.html
    1 point
  47. FIM Track Racing Youth Gold Trophy Sunday 21st July 2024 – Zarnovica 1 Erik Barth DMSB Germany 2 Andzejs Smulkevics LAMSF Latvia 3 Stepanka Nyklova ACCR Czech Republic 4 Volodomyr Skorokhod FMU Ukraine 5 Mieszko Mudło PZM Poland 6 Tajo-Nicolas Groh AMF Austria 7 Anna Zuzana Hajkova SMF Slovakia 8 Franciszek Szczyrba PZM Poland 9 Tygo Boersma KNMV The Netherlands 10 Oliver Bovingdon ACU Great Britain 11 Kristians Murnieks LAMSF Latvia 12 Andre Damian FRM Romania 13 Levi Böhme DMSB Germany 14 Topias Manner SML Finland 15 Dawid Oscenda PZM Poland 16 Boris Charbonnier FFM France 17 Charlie Luckman ACU Great Britain 18 Duncan Pfeiffer DMSB Germany 19 Arsen Mikulchyn FMU Ukraine 20 Lenja Tebbe DMSB Germany 21 Karel Prusa ACCR Czech Republic 22 Jaroslav Hajko SMF Slovakia 23 Michał Głębocki PZM Poland 24 Jakub Hejkal ACCR Czech Republic 25 Dorian Goret FFM France 26 RES Marek Ziman SMF Slovakia
    1 point
  48. They wouldn’t sack him as he is an up and coming rider who would be picked up by a rival club straight away. Threats from different countries should not allow federation rules to be broken, regardless of money. His Polish team would have known about the clash at the start of the season. As a Brit, a 30 day ban should be the order of the day for withholding his services. Harsh but stops young riders chasing the money rather than the team he should be riding for.
    1 point
  49. NO APPEAL FROM BRANDON ESTATES! As posted by the SCS group. WE have now received official confirmation that stadium owners Brandon Estates have not chosen to pursue a High Court challenge to the outcome of the recent planning inquiry. The appeal against the refusal of planning permission, arising from the November 2022 Planning Committee decision at Rugby Borough Council, was dismissed by inspector Helen Hockenhull in mid-January, after evidence from all parties had been heard last autumn. The remaining option available to the appellants would have been a Judicial Review based on a legal challenge (rather than a challenge to the decision itself). We understand speedway and stock car fans, and local residents, have been eager to know what might happen next, and there has been plenty of speculation; however, we had to wait for a six-week period to expire, which was the window in which the High Court challenge could be submitted. Recent correspondence with the Planning Inspectorate has confirmed there has been no challenge. We are naturally delighted that this marks the end of this particular part of the process, and also that our approach to each stage has been vindicated. We must once again place on record our thanks to everyone from the sporting and local community who stepped up in such spectacular numbers last summer to assist us with the cost of legal representation. Anyone who watched the planning inquiry, and will therefore now understand the way it was conducted, will have seen how being represented in this manner was crucial to our chances of success. Likewise to our witnesses and those who spoke in support of the stadium at the inquiry, your honesty and passion shone through under difficult scrutiny, and it is sincerely appreciated. There is now much for us to consider as a Campaign Group, doubtless with further meetings to be arranged over the coming weeks. At this stage it is too early to give any clear indication over what is to follow, or any timescales, other than to say that at every stage of the planning application we have worked through potential scenarios and considered our strategy under every likely circumstance. We thank everyone for their support – it has been hugely appreciated, and never more so than during the time of the Appeal – and can assure you that with this huge hurdle cleared, we retain an unstinting commitment to get speedway and stock car racing back to their rightful place at Brandon Stadium, and finally bring this saga to an end for the benefit of both the sports and the local community.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy