Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

Members
  • Posts

    17,630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Everything posted by dontforgetthefueltapsbruv

  1. You obviously havent read much of my previous posts properly or you wouldnt need to ask..... Look at the season to date averages and what Danyon had averaged from his 7 meetings.... The Greaves average is a 2nd tier average from his time at Sheffield not a top league average so no conversion required.... With regard to your last line 'all teams look to get the biggest advantage from the rules' perfectly proves my point as to is wrong with the current set up.....
  2. Expect Stefan to do very well. Capable of a lot of points at Foxhall when he finishes races and he seems to have cut out a lot of the falls and mechanical issues now.
  3. No just a few sensible individuals who can see beyond the bottom of their own team list and have an intelligent debate about what they beleive would be best for the long term integrity of the sport. 👍 Good luck for the rest of the year. Hoping the Witches can come back and collect another 4 points anyway 😛 so far off the mark its laughable. Youre right its not like for like - its a 2.27 rider in place of a 4.57 rider. The complete opposite. 😆
  4. So far there has only been a handfull of times where a rider has really used the extra space on the inside for a bold attempt to pass which has surprised me. Perhaps its because the rider in front has been canny enough to cover enough of the gap. The outside blast has been a little more productive. IMO there does seem to be a better chance there with the more consistent camber and also the extra clay content in the surface. So for me some improvement even if not dramatic.
  5. Totally agree and Ive stated at least twice that I can see why it has been. I think where the problem lies with debates like this is that human nature dictates that people link their view to how it affects their team this time and not what is right/fair regardless of when or who it affects.
  6. That couldve suited Ipswich better. No Sedge perhaps but someone like Batchelor or Porsing would fit for Nicos revised figure and Sarj couldve come in for Danyon if both of their figures were invoked. Instead we have effectively had to shed 2 points from the true average of our team. But we are not bleating about it. We are getting on and signing the best we can within the current rules.
  7. Fair point although the 2nd tier isnt specifically labelled as a development league. My comment was very much about a wider debate than just this situatìon. Much more about the rationale of the system.
  8. Not looking to stir the pot and playing devils advocate a bit (whilst acknowledging that IOW are hampered by the move) but..... ...is the title not actually the National Development League with the underlying reasoning of producing riders of a standard that can take opportunities at the next level?
  9. Not even covers can save a track from 'The Havelock Effect' though!! 🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿🚿 whoops too much 😛😛
  10. Ipswich apparently had extensive talks with Shanes but his other commitments at weekends wouldve meant he would miss upto 18 (yes eighteen) meetings. That would I imagine mean he would be off the Diamonds list as well.
  11. Ipswich is slightly different as there was not a single rider that had raced the set 4h 4a and the new 7 would still be under 40 before May 1st which is the date set in the regs.I do accept however that potentially even that situation could have fallen into my arguement. If so we wouldve looked elsewhere and signed Batchelor or similar. Of course we now have the opposite situation to Berwick. We have a no7 averaging 4.57 from 7 meetings who even running 7 lasts in the 8th meeting would be on 3.8 yet we can only replace with a 2.27 ptr.
  12. One of my earlier posts was actually to say I see why it has/will be allowed.Already this season it has been the case that other teams havent had adjustments. For that reason alone it shouldnt be blocked. My follow on posts have really only been in response to why I think this type of sutuation SHOULD be dealt with differently in the future. In an ideal world yes! But dont take that the wrong way - see the bit above.
  13. Not singling any team out. I agree rules are ignored all the time. Id be surprised if there is any team that hasnt benefited at some time. Doesnt make it right to keep doing it though. How many new starts with transparency and integrity are we going to have? And actually this could benefit my team. We have already won at Berwick. Another team may not as a result and could lose out on a play off place to Ipswich because of it. How would that be in the best interests of a sport aiming to be professional?
  14. The only reason he hasnt got his new higher average is due to missing meetings to ride elsewhere where the BSPA do not allow a facility. The MC should therefore not allow gain from that situation and should invoke the reg specifically written to stop such. Whether the manipulation us deliberate or accidental matters not.
  15. to paraphrase the above We've been sh!te Please feel sorry for us Give us a break 😲😛
  16. Welcome to the Witches Nathan. Whilst he hasnt so far made the progress that may have been expected you have to give him credit for continuing to give it a go at the higher levels. Probably the best choice of those available and likely to be a better option than any of the untried NL riders. Lets get behind him and give him a fair chance. 👏👍
  17. Because the limit is 40 or changes need to be like for like.Howe is higher than Carr so new declaration needs to be under 40 as not like for like. With Gapp on a 4 it fits but with his true average to date Berwick effectively building near to 42 gaining nearly 2 points.
  18. Good signing for you. Pleased to see Sarj signed up. If/when he drops to reserve he should be a real trump card.
  19. I see Sparks123 point.Scunny had part of the team awarded their new averages but those who had not completed 4h 4a maintained the original figure. The Scunny change wasnt like for like either with Nielsen on 5.5 and Wallner 4.
  20. Lots of positives now starting to show from much hard work and effort behind the scenes that often isnt noticed or recognsised. Long may it continue.
  21. All the best to Danny. Heres hoping for a full recovery.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy