Bagpuss Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago Odd take, dont think there's any blame attached to anybody, just a statement explaining the facts of the situation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Bagpuss said: Odd take, dont think there's any blame attached to anybody, just a statement explaining the facts of the situation. Similar reason why Ritchings is missing!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mgas Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 39 minutes ago, Bagpuss said: Odd take, dont think there's any blame attached to anybody, just a statement explaining the facts of the situation. Twice Oxford was clearly blamed. Are you reading the same statement? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagpuss Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 30 minutes ago, Mgas said: Twice Oxford was clearly blamed. Are you reading the same statement? Absolutely. No blame there that I can see. He continued to ride so why would he need medical documentation? The rule is bonkers, obviously somebody has pulled a fast one at sone point and spoiled it for everyone else. Some common sense could surely be applied as he has missed four meetings! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASpeedwayfan Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Mgas said: Twice Oxford was clearly blamed. Are you reading the same statement? Apparently not, as I can’t see where he blames Oxford either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Blobby Posted 47 minutes ago Report Share Posted 47 minutes ago “At Oxford on Wednesday 13th May despite Cooper being involved in 2 incidents on track, he continued to ride and was not withdrawn from the meeting or received any medical documentation from the Oxford medical team.” “So having not received any medical documentation from Oxford on the Wednesday” These two parts do come across as If he’s putting some form of blame on them, but it’s not on Oxford medical team to withdraw him if he’s chosen to continue to ride. It’s also on him if he’s not went and got a document signed by the doctor at the end of the night to say he had received an injury during the meeting. So really it’s his own fault, even though the rule is a bit daft in situations like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Sidney Posted 39 minutes ago Report Share Posted 39 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, Mr Blobby said: “At Oxford on Wednesday 13th May despite Cooper being involved in 2 incidents on track, he continued to ride and was not withdrawn from the meeting or received any medical documentation from the Oxford medical team.” “So having not received any medical documentation from Oxford on the Wednesday” These two parts do come across as If he’s putting some form of blame on them, but it’s not on Oxford medical team to withdraw him if he’s chosen to continue to ride. It’s also on him if he’s not went and got a document signed by the doctor at the end of the night to say he had received an injury during the meeting. So really it’s his own fault, even though the rule is a bit daft in situations like this. Surely his club should also have taken an interest to make sure the right paperwork was in place, given Cooper is only just 16 and in his first season in the league I am always amazed that clubs, and riders, are not fully conversant with the regulations. Mind you, it's not just speedway. I was at a talk this week where an international sport referee said that players in that sport regularly didn't know the laws Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.