TTT Posted October 23 Author Report Share Posted October 23 The Team picks itself if it's a 40.00 Limit. 1. J. Holder 9.08 2. A. Rowe 5.22 3. C. Holder 6.84 4. R. Tungate 5.89 or N. Morris 5.89 5. J. Pickering 7.76 6. L. Flint 5.05 (25% Discount) 7. L. Harrison (RS) = 39.84 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted October 23 Report Share Posted October 23 It’s hard to see potential buyers jumping in without knowledge of what’s going with Leagues etc..Probably all done and dusted behind the scenes.(BSPA are more secretive and closed shop than the Masonic Lodge) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PotteringAround Posted October 23 Report Share Posted October 23 3 minutes ago, TTT said: The Team picks itself if it's a 40.00 Limit. Shame it's looking like 36.00 then. As usual the weaker teams hold all the cards,evn though such a low limit won't benefit them. They just think it will. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted October 23 Report Share Posted October 23 These teams suggested if there's a 36 point limit look pretty decent to me. Maybe could make for a more exciting league if there's more riders of a similar ability competing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted October 23 Report Share Posted October 23 12 minutes ago, szkocjasid said: These teams suggested if there's a 36 point limit look pretty decent to me. Maybe could make for a more exciting league if there's more riders of a similar ability competing. Admission prices won’t drop though to match the drop in standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bagpuss Posted October 23 Report Share Posted October 23 3 hours ago, PotteringAround said: Shame it's looking like 36.00 then. As usual the weaker teams hold all the cards,evn though such a low limit won't benefit them. They just think it will. Who are these 'weaker teams'? Brum & Ox are gone and Lynn didn't want a lower limit this year so almost certainly won't for 2026. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noaksey Posted October 24 Report Share Posted October 24 18 hours ago, Bagpuss said: Who are these 'weaker teams'? Brum & Ox are gone and Lynn didn't want a lower limit this year so almost certainly won't for 2026. Maybe Sheffield and Leicester might require lower costs especially with the loss of tv revenue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col Posted October 24 Report Share Posted October 24 Would imagine Musielak will be on allot of people (Stars fans aside) want list as he struggled at Perry Barr and starts 2026 on a 6.3ish average. But it's not just UK where his average has gone down, in Poland's second tier he topped the averages a few years back with in excess of 10:00 (2.26 a ride) he's now not much over 8:00 (2.07 a ride). Still in his time as a Tiger he was always unbeatable at Owlerton on my (rare) visits. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old bob at herne bay Posted 23 hours ago Report Share Posted 23 hours ago Are Sheffield running in 2026 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InTheDeepStuff Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago 15 hours ago, old bob at herne bay said: Are Sheffield running in 2026 ? Yes will be in Premiership again in 2026 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue witch Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago On 10/23/2025 at 7:04 PM, szkocjasid said: These teams suggested if there's a 36 point limit look pretty decent to me. Maybe could make for a more exciting league if there's more riders of a similar ability competing. personally it's encouraging the weaker riders to make it more competitive instead of getting better riders over to make it more competitive. And of course at a price that makes the public doubt whether to go or not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noaksey Posted 6 hours ago Report Share Posted 6 hours ago 8 minutes ago, blue witch said: personally it's encouraging the weaker riders to make it more competitive instead of getting better riders over to make it more competitive. And of course at a price that makes the public doubt whether to go or not As Sheffield proved when trying to replace Woffinden getting better riders over appears to be virtually impossible. It may of course be different if there were plenty of money to throw at it which there clearly isn't, doubly so now there's no tv money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youhave2minutes Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, InTheDeepStuff said: Yes will be in Premiership again in 2026 Run by whom please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aries Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, noaksey said: As Sheffield proved when trying to replace Woffinden getting better riders over appears to be virtually impossible. It may of course be different if there were plenty of money to throw at it which there clearly isn't, doubly so now there's no tv money And Ipswich the season before when Doyle’s season ended in May. Louis chucked offers at every top rider on the planet, and couldn’t get one. Michelsen came the closest to joining, but in the end there were one too many obstacles to overcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamish McRaker Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago On 10/24/2025 at 1:47 PM, noaksey said: Maybe Sheffield and Leicester might require lower costs especially with the loss of tv revenue? Oxford Spires are gone. But not Oxford Cheetahs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.