Diamonds85 Posted 16 hours ago Report Share Posted 16 hours ago Got to get rid of Bowes and bring Gilkes back. Have Gilkes at 4 with Lewi and when Cooper hits his proper average you can partner him with Lewi. 1 Lawson 2 Gilkes/Newman 3 Kerr 4 Rushen 5 Cook 6 Cairns 7 Newman/Gilkes Don't need Bowes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 13 hours ago, Diamonds85 said: Got to get rid of Bowes and bring Gilkes back. Have Gilkes at 4 with Lewi and when Cooper hits his proper average you can partner him with Lewi. 1 Lawson 2 Gilkes/Newman 3 Kerr 4 Rushen 5 Cook 6 Cairns 7 Newman/Gilkes Don't need Bowes. Is Gilkes fit, not so sure myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Bitza said: Is Gilkes fit, not so sure myself. Well he seems fit enough for Leicester to have him back in the Prem!! Dickson is no fool........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 35 minutes ago, SteveLyric2 said: Well he seems fit enough for Leicester to have him back in the Prem!! Dickson is no fool........ Sorry my ignorance, let's see how he goes next week. Edited 2 hours ago by Bitza Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biffa Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago Could Dan Gilkes replace Shane Bowes though? I know it’s a straight swap for Kyle Newman as it was an injury replacement, but it would need a team re-declaration back to 40 points if Bowes was dropped, I think 🤷♂️. Do Poole have the space, average wise to swap Bowes/Gilkes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted 1 hour ago Report Share Posted 1 hour ago 55 minutes ago, Biffa said: Could Dan Gilkes replace Shane Bowes though? I know it’s a straight swap for Kyle Newman as it was an injury replacement, but it would need a team re-declaration back to 40 points if Bowes was dropped, I think 🤷♂️. Do Poole have the space, average wise to swap Bowes/Gilkes? Would have thought you could do a like for like but I am definitely not up with the rules on that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted 38 minutes ago Report Share Posted 38 minutes ago 36 minutes ago, LisaColette said: Would have thought you could do a like for like but I am definitely not up with the rules on that. Well if it's a revised 40 point declaration kind of a situation, Gilkes for Bowes isn't an option. By my calculations that team would add up to 42.57. Worth noting that Coopers GSA is now a staggering 5.6 and Cairns 4.13. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyretrax Posted 23 minutes ago Report Share Posted 23 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Biffa said: Could Dan Gilkes replace Shane Bowes though? I know it’s a straight swap for Kyle Newman as it was an injury replacement, but it would need a team re-declaration back to 40 points if Bowes was dropped, I think 🤷♂️. Do Poole have the space, average wise to swap Bowes/Gilkes? Don't think he can, Shane may get a reduction on his average as he's not ridden for a few years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.