Diamonds85 Posted Wednesday at 09:01 PM Report Share Posted Wednesday at 09:01 PM Got to get rid of Bowes and bring Gilkes back. Have Gilkes at 4 with Lewi and when Cooper hits his proper average you can partner him with Lewi. 1 Lawson 2 Gilkes/Newman 3 Kerr 4 Rushen 5 Cook 6 Cairns 7 Newman/Gilkes Don't need Bowes. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted Thursday at 10:24 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 10:24 AM 13 hours ago, Diamonds85 said: Got to get rid of Bowes and bring Gilkes back. Have Gilkes at 4 with Lewi and when Cooper hits his proper average you can partner him with Lewi. 1 Lawson 2 Gilkes/Newman 3 Kerr 4 Rushen 5 Cook 6 Cairns 7 Newman/Gilkes Don't need Bowes. Is Gilkes fit, not so sure myself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted Thursday at 10:51 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 10:51 AM 24 minutes ago, Bitza said: Is Gilkes fit, not so sure myself. Well he seems fit enough for Leicester to have him back in the Prem!! Dickson is no fool........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted Thursday at 11:24 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 11:24 AM (edited) 35 minutes ago, SteveLyric2 said: Well he seems fit enough for Leicester to have him back in the Prem!! Dickson is no fool........ Sorry my ignorance, let's see how he goes next week. Edited Thursday at 11:27 AM by Bitza Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biffa Posted Thursday at 11:35 AM Report Share Posted Thursday at 11:35 AM Could Dan Gilkes replace Shane Bowes though? I know it’s a straight swap for Kyle Newman as it was an injury replacement, but it would need a team re-declaration back to 40 points if Bowes was dropped, I think 🤷♂️. Do Poole have the space, average wise to swap Bowes/Gilkes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaColette Posted Thursday at 12:31 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 12:31 PM 55 minutes ago, Biffa said: Could Dan Gilkes replace Shane Bowes though? I know it’s a straight swap for Kyle Newman as it was an injury replacement, but it would need a team re-declaration back to 40 points if Bowes was dropped, I think 🤷♂️. Do Poole have the space, average wise to swap Bowes/Gilkes? Would have thought you could do a like for like but I am definitely not up with the rules on that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted Thursday at 01:14 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 01:14 PM 36 minutes ago, LisaColette said: Would have thought you could do a like for like but I am definitely not up with the rules on that. Well if it's a revised 40 point declaration kind of a situation, Gilkes for Bowes isn't an option. By my calculations that team would add up to 42.57. Worth noting that Coopers GSA is now a staggering 5.6 and Cairns 4.13. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tyretrax Posted Thursday at 01:29 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 01:29 PM 1 hour ago, Biffa said: Could Dan Gilkes replace Shane Bowes though? I know it’s a straight swap for Kyle Newman as it was an injury replacement, but it would need a team re-declaration back to 40 points if Bowes was dropped, I think 🤷♂️. Do Poole have the space, average wise to swap Bowes/Gilkes? Don't think he can, Shane may get a reduction on his average as he's not ridden for a few years. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biffa Posted Thursday at 02:42 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 02:42 PM 1 hour ago, tyretrax said: Don't think he can, Shane may get a reduction on his average as he's not ridden for a few years. Showing my age 🙈🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ASpeedwayfan Posted Thursday at 05:22 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 05:22 PM 4 hours ago, Bitza said: Well if it's a revised 40 point declaration kind of a situation, Gilkes for Bowes isn't an option. By my calculations that team would add up to 42.57. Worth noting that Coopers GSA is now a staggering 5.6 and Cairns 4.13. Id of thought that it would be a fine straight swap? As Bowes average is higher than Gilkes? I’d of thought that would be fine. Can’t let Neman go in this form, however if Gilkes is not 110% then I’d still keep the struggling Bowes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szkocjasid Posted Thursday at 06:30 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 06:30 PM 6 hours ago, Biffa said: Could Dan Gilkes replace Shane Bowes though? I know it’s a straight swap for Kyle Newman as it was an injury replacement, but it would need a team re-declaration back to 40 points if Bowes was dropped, I think 🤷♂️. Do Poole have the space, average wise to swap Bowes/Gilkes? If you sign a rider on a lower average, Gilkes being lower than Bowes, then the teams average does not matter. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitza Posted Thursday at 09:35 PM Report Share Posted Thursday at 09:35 PM 3 hours ago, szkocjasid said: If you sign a rider on a lower average, Gilkes being lower than Bowes, then the teams average does not matter. Gilkes it is then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foreverblue Posted Friday at 07:32 AM Report Share Posted Friday at 07:32 AM 18 hours ago, Bitza said: Well if it's a revised 40 point declaration kind of a situation, Gilkes for Bowes isn't an option. By my calculations that team would add up to 42.57. Worth noting that Coopers GSA is now a staggering 5.6 and Cairns 4.13. Coopers average is still 2.00 on latest figures as he hasnt ridden enough meetings yet. Total current team average on official website is 40.47. Gilkes average is nearly a point lower than Bowes so we could re-declare or swap rider for rider. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted Friday at 08:11 AM Report Share Posted Friday at 08:11 AM 20 hours ago, Biffa said: Could Dan Gilkes replace Shane Bowes though? I know it’s a straight swap for Kyle Newman as it was an injury replacement, but it would need a team re-declaration back to 40 points if Bowes was dropped, I think 🤷♂️. Do Poole have the space, average wise to swap Bowes/Gilkes? Shane🤔 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveLyric2 Posted Friday at 10:48 AM Report Share Posted Friday at 10:48 AM 3 hours ago, foreverblue said: Coopers average is still 2.00 on latest figures as he hasnt ridden enough meetings yet. Total current team average on official website is 40.47. Gilkes average is nearly a point lower than Bowes so we could re-declare or swap rider for rider. When Cooper gets his proper average, who would be a better reserve? Bowes, Gilkes or Newman? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirates Of Poole Posted Friday at 03:56 PM Report Share Posted Friday at 03:56 PM 5 hours ago, SteveLyric2 said: When Cooper gets his proper average, who would be a better reserve? Bowes, Gilkes or Newman? Beau Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted Friday at 04:00 PM Report Share Posted Friday at 04:00 PM Thought the racing was decent in a decently watered track although as usual some riders don’t like to get their Kevlar dirty . 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fromafar Posted Friday at 04:02 PM Report Share Posted Friday at 04:02 PM Thought the racing was decent in a decently watered track although as usual some riders don’t like to get their Kevlar dirty . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitelinehugger Posted Friday at 06:22 PM Report Share Posted Friday at 06:22 PM On 4/30/2026 at 6:22 PM, ASpeedwayfan said: Id of thought that it would be a fine straight swap? As Bowes average is higher than Gilkes? I’d of thought that would be fine. Can’t let Neman go in this form, however if Gilkes is not 110% then I’d still keep the struggling Bowes Bowes out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitelinehugger Posted Friday at 06:23 PM Report Share Posted Friday at 06:23 PM So good you had to post it twice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.