Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Ipswich Witches 2026


TTT

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, B.V 72 said:

Becker and Janowski have also signed up in 3 leagues so will not be back in 2026.

Try searching Continental European speedway teams 2026 to find all other leagues and who has signed elsewhere.

 

That tends to happen when riders are left in the dark …

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notiable Riders who haven't signed up in 3 Leagues.

 

Tai Woffinden (Rumoured No.1)

Jaimon Lidsey

Tom Brennan (Rumoured to Return)

Richard Lawson

Niels-Kristian Iversen

Tobiasz Musielak (Rumoured to be in the side)

Danny King

Matej Zagar

Nicolai Klindt

Charles Wright

Keynan Rew (Rumoured to Return)

Rohan Tungate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jenkins does get the 25% Reduction again because the rules aren't worth the paper they're written on.

 

Team A

1. T. Woffinden 8.45

2. 5.22 or 5.35 left (S. Nicholls?)

3. T. Musielak 6.63 or D. King 6.50

4. K. Rew 6.19

5. T. Brennan 7.05

6. J. Jenkins 3.46

7. J. Edwards (RS)

 

Team B

1. J. Lidsey 7.87

2. 5.80 left (S. Nicholls or a 5.00 Newcomer)

3. & 4. (Any combination of T. Musielak 6.63, D. King 6.50 and K. Rew 6.19)

5. T. Brennan 7.05

6. J. Jenkins 3.46

7. J. Edwards (RS)

 

Team C (Strength in depth like Leicester)

1. T. Brennan 7.05

2. K. Rew 6.19

3. 6.84 left (N-K. Iversen 6.71, D. King 6.50 or N. Klindt 6.46)

4. T. Musielak 6.63

5. R. Lawson 6.83

6. J. Jenkins 3.46

7. J. Edwards (RS)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems to confirm that, even if a 6th venue were to materialise, it would struggle to track a competitive team and be even worse than Birmingham 2024-25 both performance and financially.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Hamish McRaker said:

This seems to confirm that, even if a 6th venue were to materialise, it would struggle to track a competitive team and be even worse than Birmingham 2024-25 both performance and financially.

Kurtz not signed for the Speedway Team Benevolent Fund ((I mean Belle Vue - sorry  Ouch) so there is hope yet

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

Kurtz not signed for the Speedway Team Benevolent Fund ((I mean Belle Vue - sorry  Ouch) so there is hope yet

It had previously crossed my mind that Kurtz could be on the move from BV and that "team 6" could be the place. Intriguing that BV announced Bewley when the other No.1's were being unveiled, and not Kurtz despite having a higher average.

Didnt think that BV could fit both within the 37 limit but apparently it's possible.

But yes, it could be that the kind and generous Mr Lemon, acting out of genuine broader interest (and im not being sarcastic) could be taking charge of things 

Edited by Hamish McRaker
Wording
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, therefused said:

there is no way Jenkins is that average. It hasnt been applied to other riders leaving the scheme. 

It has been applied to EVERY rider leaving the scheme - including Jenkins himself

The debate is whether he qualifies a second time

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

It has been applied to EVERY rider leaving the scheme - including Jenkins himself

The debate is whether he qualifies a second time

What happens if they're a falling star?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, dontforgetthefueltapsbruv said:

It has been applied to EVERY rider leaving the scheme - including Jenkins himself

The debate is whether he qualifies a second time

Certainly when the rule was created, it was a 25% reduction the FIRST time a rider leaves the RS system only.

Otherwise a rider could manipulate his average to flip in and out of RS every 2 years.

But who knows what ruling could be reached now "in the best interests of speedway"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Aries said:

 

Some interesting wording used in that statement; ‘a sale has been agreed’ and ‘now going through due process’.

Does that mean that Financial Due Diligence has been completed or will now be undertaken as part of the ‘due process?

FDD can scupper an agreed sale, so if it’s the latter, then I remain a little nervous. Hopefully, it is just referring to completion of the legals. 
 

Edited by JamesB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy