Jump to content
British Speedway Forum

Sheffield v King's Lynn 17/08/26


Bagpuss

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Gaz said:

Let’s have a speedway riders benevolent fund collection on a night it’s meant to rain. 😔

They started late then wasted more time doing the ben fund,  rain was always likely.  they picked the ben fund collection on a night when attendance was going to be down due to it being on the telly. very poor from Sheffield.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dornier said:

They started late then wasted more time doing the ben fund,  rain was always likely.  they picked the ben fund collection on a night when attendance was going to be down due to it being on the telly. very poor from Sheffield.

Yep, shortchange the punters by a heat and expect them to tip up more of their hard earned for the Ben Fund, typical British speedway.

To clarify, was the correct decision to call it off but could so easily have been avoided with a little foresight.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most bizarre exclusion for Cook - Lynn unlucky there. I think refs should  explain why some decisions are made, i presume Lynn raised the issue over the phone etc, or does that not happen now??  - not seen the full stream nor was at the match but seeing the replay it seem Etheridge out was the only choice 😶

Its really peeing down now, first proper rain in Sheffield for weeks!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just played catchup and the decision to exclude Cook was appalling! Where on earth is he meant to go when Etheridge was locked up and out of control?

Ref completely bonkers decision and did Etheridge even bother to come over and apologise to Cook after he caused the smash that wrecked a bike?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is stopping the Sheffield track being widened by a few feet onto the infield? Would potentially make it a much better spectacle with more racing lines and safer. Every meeting I've seen, after first few races the only place to be is millimeters from the fence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, kelvinht said:

What is stopping the Sheffield track being widened by a few feet onto the infield? Would potentially make it a much better spectacle with more racing lines and safer. Every meeting I've seen, after first few races the only place to be is millimeters from the fence?

Seem recall hearing that previous promoter Neil Machin wanted to do this, but was refused permission from Stadium owners.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Steve Shovlar said:

Just played catchup and the decision to exclude Cook was appalling! Where on earth is he meant to go when Etheridge was locked up and out of control?

Ref completely bonkers decision and did Etheridge even bother to come over and apologise to Cook after he caused the smash that wrecked a bike?

No I don't think Etheridge said anything to Ben, Etheridge looked a liability all night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, foreverblue said:

No I don't think Etheridge said anything to Ben, Etheridge looked a liability all night.

Etheridge has had a shocker of a season with Sheffield, thought they would've sacked him early doors but who was available on such a low average to replace him? He's a rider with absolutely no confidence in himself when riding in the Prem. 

When he downed Jenkins it was the start of lap two, he'd been all over the back of Jenkins up to then and was obviously faster than him, all he had to do was bide his time and he'd have passed him easily. The incident in heat 11 was abysmal, both from Etheridge and the referee. Riding a wide line he was well behind Fricke and there was room for him to continue that line as Fricke wasn't that close to the fence. Why he chose to change his line, across the front of Cook, only he'll know. The same applies to Ackroyd as to why he excluded Cook....unbelievable!

Don't know what Etheridge was on last night, but his head wasn't right, he came out in heat seven with the wrong helmet colour, pity he had to have three rides! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, nw42 said:

Yep, shortchange the punters by a heat and expect them to tip up more of their hard earned for the Ben Fund, typical British speedway.

To clarify, was the correct decision to call it off but could so easily have been avoided with a little foresight.

Why not give the BEN fund the money the teams saved not forking out for Heat 15?..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunate the rain came as it had been a decent meeting up to that point, certainly far more entertaining than the one between these two last month.

Difficult to understand just how anyone could come to the decision to exclude Cook, would have been a shocker even without the benefit of replays.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In view of the rain being forecast, it should have been tapes up at 7.30 ( not rider introductions), and get on with it a bit quicker.

Owner's may have saved on wages, but I am now considering not going to the Belle Vue match. I pay to watch speedway, not for the introductions. How many others feel the same?

Could have been an interesting finish. Could Sheffield have got the aggregate point? Could there have been a superheat for the aggregate point?. Could Kings Lynn have got a draw. We'll never know. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The refs decision is consistent with many other decisions made during racing incidents and non incidents. Let me explain. Last night Ben ran into Jye and crashed and was therefore the cause of the stoppage. Straight forward and as per the rules and not controversial. However the root cause of the crash was Jye pulling a locker. I have seen many occasions when a rider in front gets into trouble, clearly impedes the rider behinds race but never gets pulled up if no crash. There was a Worky v Scunthorpe mtg and one of the Comets was all over the place and nearly took out Steve Worrall. Luckily Worralls experience avoided a crash, but left him stone last whilst the Comet on the bucking bronco continued. At Berwick 2 weeks ago Reid Battye reared on the back straight, caught the fence and bounced across the track hitting teammate Palovaara and Workys Jeppersen ending the Danes race. Battye still won the race, but he impeded an opponent and went un punished. The root cause of incidents should be targeted not the outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also Cooper Rushden at Northampton when he veered to the left and this sent a rider behind (Luke Harrison?) into the deck, i think also on that occasion the fallen rider was excluded much to many peoples expectations, least not Jan on comms.

Honestly think Ref's should spend a day or two learning how to ride a speedway bike just for the experience so they can better understand race situations, or even have a rider from the riders association give a talk to them pre season so they could help identify some of the nuances of racing.

The ref's read the book as its wrongly written, "the leading rider can choose his or her line"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The refs decision is consistent with many other decisions made during racing incidents and non incidents. Let me explain. Last night Ben ran into Jye and crashed and was therefore the cause of the stoppage. Straight forward and as per the rules and not controversial. However the root cause of the crash was Jye pulling a locker. I have seen many occasions when a rider in front gets into trouble, clearly impedes the rider behinds race but never gets pulled up if no crash. There was a Worky v Scunthorpe mtg and one of the Comets was all over the place and nearly took out Steve Worrall. Luckily Worralls experience avoided a crash, but left him stone last whilst the Comet on the bucking bronco continued. At Berwick 2 weeks ago Reid Battye reared on the back straight, caught the fence and bounced across the track hitting teammate Palovaara and Workys Jeppersen ending the Danes race. Battye still won the race, but he impeded an opponent and went un punished. The root cause of incidents should be targeted not the outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Privacy Policy