Point 1. The SCB never said this. They said that the rule was breached. No ifs, no buts. It doesn't matter what you or I or anyone says or interprets what was said, the rule was breached. The only reason the result stands is because of rule SCB Regulation 018.1.2 a) which says the announced result on the night can't be overturned after the fact. Poole won on a technicality. 

So you're saying that the SCB have a different interpretation of the rules than the officials that oversee them??  It gets worse! 🫣

I'm wondering whether he'll race in Britain at all after Dan Bewley's OTT reaction. I don't know why Dan would've been so bothered from a personal point of view when the Polish rule wouldn't effect him considering he wants to ride in Britain every year. Maybe he was speaking up for his SoN partner Robert Lambert?

Ok. Maybe i need to be more clear. 1. SCB are saying front wheel over the line and rear wheel on the line is excluded. 2. Ref did it on basis of being over the line imo. Otherwise he would have excluded Zach. This is where interpretation is different. Maybe they should write things better so no misunderstanding. 3. Two other refs have apparently said they wouldn't have excluded Zach either. 4. Josh Pickering even David Howe DID NOT KNOW before superheat that rear wheel on the white line meant exclusion. (360 podcast). 5. Imo they only looked through rules because superheat went against them. If they won superheat, rules wouldn't have been looked at and nothing said or known.   

What about Tom Brennan?

No interpretation... "Having reviewed the regulation as written, this has been breached" Seems clear enough.