-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By Pirates Of Poole · Posted
Well done to Oxford, they wanted it more than majority of our boys. Track was set up for rain, slick and not ideal for racing but that’s the way it went. Two poor away meetings now and we need to see an improvement from a couple of the boys in the main part of the team. Coops should have had more than 4 rides, why we kept Newman and Bowes in their 4th ride is beyond me, the only point they scored was because the other Poole rider packed up. It’s all good and well scoring well at home but we need them to show up away. -
By ONTWOMINUTES · Posted
Your Mrs quote is exactly spot on , no more words needed to sum up speedway nowadays. -
Who the hell does this fella think he is? Transparency, and Accountability, indeed.... He will be seeking Credibility and Integrity next.... Then, before you know it, he will be after meetings being ran with Jeopardy and Consequences, which could even end up givng the competitions Prestige and some larger financial backing... A slippery slope, this.....
-
By ASpeedwayfan · Posted
Poole were poor but, Rushen gave it 110% and I thought was impressive, sadly he’s a racer and the track was a railway. Cairns did his job, Bowes was poor. -
Poor racing track-very slick, no grip, gate & go, virtually no passing& very boring to watch, waste of £13.99. Poole underperformed,There may well have been reasons but IMO: Lawson-disapointing, Newman-poor, Kerr-average, Bowes-poor, Cook-Ok, Cairns disapointing but only 16, Rushen-OK 12 points should make 2nd leg interesting but generally Poole excel at Poole
-
-
Who's Online (See full list)
- Heathcote
- GeneralMelchett
- gregory peck
- Mgas
- Arthur54
- IainB
- Trees2026
- tocha
- Chris
- HomeStraight
- ouch
- lewy
- ONTWOMINUTES
- Bunters
- tyke
- Daniel Smith
- Pirates Of Poole
- minteduk
- Alun
- flagrag
- B.V 72
- CUFC_Brummie
- NumberEight
- MB723
- rusky
- MC7
- szkocjasid
- MMX Events
- Bellers101
- edmon
- Barney Rabbit
- poole keith
- bellevueace
- CTD26
- Bluekevin
- lonny29